Re: New framework to review: KPackage

2014-12-22 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 10 December 2014, David Edmundson wrote: > ​The binary is called kpackagetool. Given the complications we've had with > frameworks co-installability does it make sense to call it kpackagetool5? > > The class name in kpackagetool/kpackagetool.cpp should probably be renamed > > Documen

Re: New framework to review: KPackage

2014-12-10 Thread David Edmundson
​The binary is called kpackagetool. Given the complications we've had with frameworks co-installability does it make sense to call it kpackagetool5? The class name in kpackagetool/kpackagetool.cpp should probably be renamed Documentation at the top of PackageLoader should avoid saying Plasma quit

Re: New framework to review: KPackage

2014-12-10 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 10 December 2014, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I would like to submit it (kpackage repo) for the usual 2 weeks period of > > review. > > Add const & > void setDefaultMimeTypes(QStringList mimeTypes); > void setMimeTypes(const char *key, QStringList mimeTypes); > > You probabl

Re: New framework to review: KPackage

2014-12-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 3 de desembre de 2014, a les 16:29:11, Marco Martin va escriure: > Hi all, > > In the past weeks I have been working on a new framework, called KPackage. > (during Akademy seemed there was some interest for applications to use it) > It comes from the old classes Plasma::Package, so is

New framework to review: KPackage

2014-12-03 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, In the past weeks I have been working on a new framework, called KPackage. (during Akademy seemed there was some interest for applications to use it) It comes from the old classes Plasma::Package, so is actually old and tested code. It can be used by any application that wants to ship an