On Thursday 28 May 2015 22:52:17 David Rosca wrote:
> It's been over 14 days now, so if there are no objections, I will ask
> sysadmins to move it to frameworks.
>
> Also, are there any other steps I should do besides moving the repository?
It looks fine, it's getting picked up for KF 5.11.
--
It's been over 14 days now, so if there are no objections, I will ask
sysadmins to move it to frameworks.
Also, are there any other steps I should do besides moving the repository?
Thanks,
David
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:44 PM, David Rosca wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to submit bluez-qt [1] f
Hi all,
I'd like to submit bluez-qt [1] for a review and then release it as
part of frameworks 5.11.
It is used in Bluedevil since the first release with Plasma 5.3. I
have worked on API changes (it is source incompatible from the 5.3
version) and also added a new tests (including QML tests).
I b
Hi all,
BluezQt is a wrapper library for Bluez 5 DBus API. It will be
used in Bluedevil as a replacement for libbluedevil.
It is currently in playground (playground/libs/bluez-qt).
It should be a Tier 1 framework (only depends on Qt libs).
The code should follow all framework policies and the bu
I'm forwarding the reply here too:
> The name KF5BluezQt seems inelegant, is has both a prefix and a suffix, how
> about just KF5Bluez?
That would work, but only for cmake files, otherwise I would have to
change namespace from BluezQt to just Bluez, which is obviously
not a right thing.
> The h
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:12:31PM +0100, David Rosca wrote:
> BluezQt is a wrapper library for Bluez 5 DBus API. It will be
> used in Bluedevil as a replacement for libbluedevil.
> It is currently in playground (playground/libs/bluez-qt).
>
> It should be a Tier 1 framework (only depends on Qt li
