El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:30:14, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
> everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
> For that I opened what will be the last
Le mercredi 18 décembre 2013 00:00:57 Cornelius Schumacher a écrit :
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > That's an option. We could also see if we could make inqlude.org job
> > easier, I guess it uses a similar input format too.
>
> Yes, inqlude.org uses a similar meta file, but
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> I have now re-split kdelibs, updated repositories can be found in the
> usual place.
> One new conflict did come up - kdnssd is already taken, so it was called
> kdnssd-framework instead.
>
Thank you Ben. I've just pushed updates to kdesr
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> > Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
>> > itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 Kevin Ottens wrote:
>
> That's an option. We could also see if we could make inqlude.org job
> easier, I guess it uses a similar input format too.
Yes, inqlude.org uses a similar meta file, but I would argue it's more simple,
and we have full control about it. I was a
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 11:32:46 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >>> Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
> >>> branch of the
> >>> kdelibs repository afte
On 17/12/13 15:31, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 17/12/13 15:26, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
>>> On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
> assume, a consistent look-n-feel for
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating
On 17/12/13 15:26, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:44 +, Alex Merry wrote:
>> On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
>>>
>>> Yes.
On 17/12/13 12:57, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> I guess the question is - what does this module actually bring. I
>> assume, a consistent look-n-feel for KDE-produced api docs, right?
>
> Yes. It also goes a bit further by doing things like generating menus
> in the sidebar and handling cross-doxygen
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:25:02 +0100, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
this will be in lin
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
> itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd.
Let's rename the repos to kitemmodels, kitemviews and kdnssd,
this will be in line with karchive and most others (this doesn't change th
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
> > itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
> > descriptive as to what they contain and
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 23:27:39 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Other than apidox, I was also concerned about frameworkintegration,
> itemmodels, itemviews and dnssd. The rest of the names are quite
> descriptive as to what they contain and are fine.
Yeah, itemmodels and itemviews often come up as not
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
branch of the
kdelibs repository after the split? Is it going to be removed or is
it
going to stay there with the fra
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:59 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > > I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
> >> repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on c
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Do you want us to add ourselves as contacts in the table or do you
plan to
fill it later? If the former, I would assign myself to "Get the
dependency
graph generator script
On 17/12/13 08:37, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
>> repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
>> namespace. Suggestions are welcome.
>
> In case anyo
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:59:45 +0100, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of
those
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 21:40:48 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
> > > repositories however as they are very generic -
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
> > repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
> > namespace. Suggestions are welcome
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those
> repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common
> namespace. Suggestions are welcome.
In case anyone wonders, here's the full list of frameworks:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
>> > On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> > > Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean,
>> thanks
>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
> > On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean,
> thanks
> > > to
> > > everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the t
Hello,
On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Do you want us to add ourselves as contacts in the table or do you plan to
> fill it later? If the former, I would assign myself to "Get the dependency
> graph generator script ready", "Have the frameworks on api.kde.org" (already
Le samedi 14 décembre 2013 20:30:14 Kevin Ottens a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
> everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
> For that I opened what will be the last epic for the 5.0 rel
On 15/12/13 21:18, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
>> I'd like to rename the makekdewidgets executable to something like
>> kgendesignerplugin, to be more descriptive; this should be SC providing
>> we keep the old CMake variables around, but should proba
On Sunday 15 December 2013 16:38:40 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:30:14, Kevin Ottens va
escriure:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks
> > to
> > everyone who helped to get there. Now it's
On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks
> > to
> > everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last
> > push. For that I opened what will be the
El Dissabte, 14 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:30:14, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
> everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
> For that I opened what will be the last
On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
> everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
> For that I opened what will be the last epic for the 5.0 release:
> http://community.kde.org/Framew
On Saturday 14 December 2013 20:55:30 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi Kévin,
>
> On Saturday, December 14, 2013 20:30:14 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Once the technology preview is tagged, then all attention will be needed
> > on the remaining tasks to get a final release. This list looks
> > suspiciously
Hi Kévin,
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 20:30:14 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Once the technology preview is tagged, then all attention will be needed on
> the remaining tasks to get a final release. This list looks suspiciously
> short to me (although some tasks are in fact rather large), so either we
Hello everyone,
Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, thanks to
everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the time to go for the last push.
For that I opened what will be the last epic for the 5.0 release:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/KF5.0_Release_Prepa
35 matches
Mail list logo
