On 10/04/14 06:21, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> Are there any objections to me pushing this (along with relevant changes
>> - mostly to CMake code and comments - in other repos, of course)?
>
> Good to go from my side. The earlier the better for that one.
I've got some compatbility CMake code written.
Hello,
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 18:33:38 Alex Merry wrote:
> I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's
> long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it
> on RB, but the gist is:
>
> kde4support -> kdelibs4support
> KDE4SUPPORT -> KDELIBS4SUPP
On 09/04/14 20:07, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 19:33:20 Alex Merry wrote:
>> On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote:
>>> What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all
>>> KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support?
>>
>> Yes, that's what the changes I've g
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 19:33:20 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all
> > KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support?
>
> Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up require.
wouldn't it be possible
On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote:
> What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all
> KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support?
Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up require.
Alex
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
> I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's
> long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it
> on RB, but the gist is:
>
> kde4support -> kdelibs4support
> KDE4SUPPORT -> KDELIBS4SUPPORT
> KDE4S
I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's
long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it
on RB, but the gist is:
kde4support -> kdelibs4support
KDE4SUPPORT -> KDELIBS4SUPPORT
KDE4Support -> KDELibs4Support
KDE4 Support -> KDELibs 4 Support (eg: