On Monday 23 December 2013 19:45:36 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > - plasma-framework: this framework uses multiple licenses, but majority is
> > LGPL (this is the case for many other frameworks). Should we use a LGPL
> > 2.1
> > COPYING.LIB file?
>
> A quick att
On 23/12/13 19:48, Alex Merry wrote:
> On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> - kmediaplayer: all the code is X11. Should we license the whole framework
>> under X11?
>
> Well, the source tarball can be distributed under the X11 license, but
> any builds will link against LGPL code, and hen
On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> - kmediaplayer: all the code is X11. Should we license the whole framework
> under X11?
Well, the source tarball can be distributed under the X11 license, but
any builds will link against LGPL code, and hence must be distributed
under that license.
I w
On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> - plasma-framework: this framework uses multiple licenses, but majority is
> LGPL (this is the case for many other frameworks). Should we use a LGPL 2.1
> COPYING.LIB file?
A quick attack with git grep shows the majority of code to be LGPL 2
(+), with
Le lundi 23 décembre 2013 18:30:11 Kevin Ottens a écrit :
> > Missing COPYING.LIB files are more annoying, though. Right now they are
> > missing in kf5umbrella, kmediaplayer and plasma-framework (but I assume
> > plasma-framework is not part from the tp1?) I am going to add them this
> > afternoon
