Re: Fancy header policy

2013-07-23 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 23 July 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote: ... > > Also, under what folder name should there includes be installed? > > Currently the fancy includes are installed in a KDE folder > > (/include/KDE/fancyHeaders). Do we want to continue with

Re: Fancy header policy

2013-07-23 Thread Benjamin Port
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:15:52 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:05:59 Benjamin Port wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think > > > anyone put the work in yet. > > > > Yes,

Re: Fancy header policy

2013-07-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:05:59 Benjamin Port wrote: > On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > > The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think > > anyone put the work in yet. > > Yes, I think we need to find a way to generate fancy header. But we probab

Re: Fancy header policy

2013-07-23 Thread Alex Merry
On 23/07/13 09:05, Benjamin Port wrote: > IMO we need to have subdirectory because we can't be sure that we don't have > 2 > headers with the same name in 2 differents frameworks. Except that if we did, that would suggest we had a class name duplicated across two frameworks, which would cause is

Re: Fancy header policy

2013-07-23 Thread Benjamin Port
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but > > notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy > > headers. Is there any pol

Re: Fancy header policy

2013-07-22 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Saturday 20 July 2013 03:12:25 Vishesh Handa wrote: > I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but > notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy > headers. Is there any policy on what needs to be done about it? > > Some of the fancy headers,

Fancy header policy

2013-07-22 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey guys I've been looking at the frameworks branch and I cannot help but notice that there is an 'include' folder which contains all the fancy headers. Is there any policy on what needs to be done about it? Some of the fancy headers, such as the Nepomuk ones, should just be discarded. Should th