or features you not use
yourself at all),
any meaningful review is a full-time job. e.g. in our company you would let
some student
test the changed behavior some days. This is just not feasible for me, and yes,
for some of these changes, rather than abandoning them (and trashing precious
work
Name: projectroot Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 60 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s),
> Total: 61 test(s)
> * Failed: projectroot.autotests.kateindenttest_testCppstyle
>
> Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 5 test(s),
> Skipped: 0
> test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
-
t;
>> Name: projectroot.autotests.src Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 4 test(s),
>> Skipped: 0
>> test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
>> * Failed: projectroot.autotests.src.vimode.vimode_keys
>
> --
> - Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann -
kipped: 0
> test(s), Total: 5 test(s)
> * Failed: projectroot.autotests.src.vimode.vimode_keys
--
----- Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewandte Informatik GmbH Email: cullm...@absint.com
Science Park 1 Tel: +49-681-38360-22
66123 Saarbrücke
81% (1894/2325) 60%
> (1042/1751)
> src.vimode.config 0% (0/1)0% (0/1)0% (0/124) 0%
> (0/88)
> src.vimode.emulatedcommandbar 100% (12/12)100% (12/12)99%
> (904/915) 91%
> (617/678)
> src.vimode.modes 1
ot sure that cutting them off will
help.
Greetings
Christoph
P.S.
I appreciate all the work you put in the CI (and all other stuff you admin)!
--
- Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewandte Informatik GmbH Email: cullm...@absint.com
Science Park 1 Tel: +49-
least in Kate (that uses a lot of frameworks), I am not aware
of any real remaining issue with qstandardpaths.
You can go the monolithic app bundle way with that or the "I share stuff" way
like on Linux.
Actually all frameworks I patched use the QRC way on Linux nowadays, too,
which
(root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 65 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total:
> 66 test(s)
> * Failed: TestSuite.bug205447
--
----- Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewandte Informatik GmbH Email: cullm...@absint.com
Science Park 1
