Re: KDE Frameworks & Plasma 5.8 LTS

On Sunday 23 of October 2016 22:50:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 23 d’octubre de 2016, a les 14:03:28 CEST, Luca Beltrame va > > escriure: > > Il giorno Sun, 23 Oct 2016 12:14:51 +0200 > > > > Dominik Haumann ha scritto: > > > Do we have any knowledge on whether distributions that s

Re: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5FileMetaData.so | lib/libKF5FileMetaData.3.dylib

On Thursday 17 of December 2015 12:51:42 René J. V. Bertin wrote: > šumski wrote: > >> Yes, bug fixes can do that ;) > > > > Yes, but frameworks are under BC guarantee. > > So how are bugs supposed to be fixed if they break ABI compatibility? Certainly not by

Re: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5FileMetaData.so | lib/libKF5FileMetaData.3.dylib

On Wednesday 16 of December 2015 22:30:43 René J. V. Bertin wrote: > šumski wrote: > >> Fixed, it was an oversight when converting the lib into a KF5 framework. > > > > But this is a BiC change... > > Yes, bug fixes can do that ;) Yes, but frameworks are under

Re: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libKF5FileMetaData.so | lib/libKF5FileMetaData.3.dylib

On Wednesday 16 of December 2015 09:08:03 David Faure wrote: > Fixed, it was an oversight when converting the lib into a KF5 framework. But this is a BiC change... Cheers, Hrvoje ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https

Re: KDE Frameworks 5.8

On Saturday 07 of March 2015 17:24:17 David Faure wrote: > Dear packagers, > > Here's KF 5.8.0 > > New frameworks: kpeople and kxmlrpcclient. A few things regarding kpeople: It requires Qt 5.3, rest of KF5 5.2; it uses strange version 0.5.0, rest of KF5 uses the same version as release; it uses

Re: backwards compatibility & how namespacing might help or not

On Monday 26 of January 2015 17:22:49 Harald Sitter wrote: > ahoy ahoy > > so... > kf5.7 will contain kglobalacceld5 > plasma5.2 will also contain kglobalacceld5 if it was built with kf5.6 > > this poses a binary conflict which makes kf5.7 not a simple "drop-in" > replacement for kf5.6 without re

Re: Move of kglobalacceld from plasma-workspace to kglobalaccel framework

On Thursday 18 of December 2014 20:15:52 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:11 PM, šumski wrote: > > Hi, > > i've checked your clone, and what new requirements will that bring, and > > if the > > CMakeLists there are accurate, that will crea

Re: Move of kglobalacceld from plasma-workspace to kglobalaccel framework

On Wednesday 17 of December 2014 21:11:04 šumski wrote: > On Monday 15 of December 2014 13:55:04 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Friday 12 December 2014 12:38:20 Martin Klapetek wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > > > > On 2014-09-

Re: Move of kglobalacceld from plasma-workspace to kglobalaccel framework

On Monday 15 of December 2014 13:55:04 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Friday 12 December 2014 12:38:20 Martin Klapetek wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > > > On 2014-09-17 10:47, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I just prepared moving kglobalacceld from p

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #288

On Tuesday 21 of October 2014 20:33:41 šumski wrote: > On Tuesday 21 of October 2014 19:58:55 KDE CI System wrote: > > See <http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs4support_master_qt5/288/changes> > > > > > In file included from > > <http://build.kde.org/job

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs4support_master_qt5 #288

On Tuesday 21 of October 2014 19:58:55 KDE CI System wrote: > See > In file included from > > :21:0: >

Re: KAuth and KF5

On Monday 30 of June 2014 17:31:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em seg 30 jun 2014, às 14:14:10, Milian Wolff escreveu: > > On Monday 30 June 2014 00:05:10 šumski wrote: > > > On Thursday 26 of June 2014 12:14:49 Milian Wolff wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > >

Re: KAuth and KF5

exit (in /lib64/libc-2.19.so) ==30114==by 0x5C4CB0B: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.19.so) > On Wednesday 25 June 2014 23:17:29 Luca Beltrame wrote: > > šumski wrote: > > > http://paste.opensuse.org/view/raw/45956382 > > > > In case the pastebin link expires: >

Re: KAuth and KF5

On Wednesday 25 of June 2014 11:40:35 Milian Wolff wrote: > On Tuesday 24 June 2014 23:44:12 Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Hello, > > > > currently, the KF5 version of KAuth is not quite usable as any helper > > used by KAuth segfaults: the most notable is backlighthelper, which > > always crashes at l

Re: Plasma 5 Beta 2 tars

On Thursday 12 of June 2014 14:53:57 Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2014, šumski wrote: > > Unfortunately, we cannot touch the buildhost, only sources which are > > built (and i'm running x86_64 OS). > > You might be right about kde_file, though seems to be a

Re: Plasma 5 Beta 2 tars

On Wednesday 11 of June 2014 17:07:04 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > [CC:ing frameworks-devel, hoping for additional input] > > On Friday, June 06, 2014 23:24:50 šumski wrote: > > On Friday 06 of June 2014 21:32:48 Eric Hameleers wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, ?umski wrote: &

Re: Update your copy of extra-cmake-modules

On Friday 18 of April 2014 10:37:50 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: ... > I made it that way intentionally because I consider it bad to have different > code generated depending on whether you have the framework is built from a > release tarball or from git. > > I understand this means more build dependenc

Re: Update your copy of extra-cmake-modules

On Wednesday 16 of April 2014 07:36:57 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Hi, > > I just pushed some changes to frameworks using Qt for translations which > requires a recent version of extra-cmake-modules (you need to have > 071581a3f899c881c9938efd082fd32589822b45). If you get build failures > complaining

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Monday 07 of April 2014 22:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:24:44, šumski va escriure: > > On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > i've started pushing Fram

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > Hi all, > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > frameworks licenses. > ... Last items =) KRunner and

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > Hi all, > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > frameworks licenses. ... Next one, kinit[1]: "src/

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote: > What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven't read the back info and > don't feel like digging. :) > Quote: "kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp|h) and kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/k

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > Hi all, > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > frameworks licenses. Ok, after next batch, issue ca

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Thursday 20 of February 2014 11:41:48 Alex Merry wrote: > CC'd people: please can you confirm that you would be happy to have the > files listed below relicensed from GPL to LGPLv2+? Small ping :) It would be awesome if we could get this sorted for alpha2 Cheers, Hrvoje >

Re: setting SOVERSION to 5

On Tuesday 25 of February 2014 18:45:15 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 25 February 2014 17:12:37 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > OK, but then the said change is either in the packaging or in our own > > > cmake > > > files as we'd ha

Re: setting SOVERSION to 5

On Monday 24 of February 2014 16:13:48 Jonathan Riddell wrote: ... > Shall I do this change to the frameworks? My opinion as a fellow packager is - please don't. IMHO, now that the versioning is fully correct, it would be really weird to have soversion 5 at version 4.97.0 Cheers, Hrvoje > Jon

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Saturday 22 of February 2014 17:39:33 Alex Merry wrote: > On 20/02/14 16:00, šumski wrote: > > KItemModels are even more GPL, than LGPLv2+, 'only' > > main.cpp, lessthanwidget.(cpp|h), mainwindow.(cpp|h), > > selectionpmwidget.(cpp|h), descendantpmwidget.(cpp|

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Thursday 20 of February 2014 11:41:48 Alex Merry wrote: ... > KItemModels > > kcheckableproxymodel.(cpp|h) is Stephen Kelly (and, for safety, David > Faure). > > modeltest.(cpp|h) were taken from Qt Concurrent, and subsequently > modified by Stephen Kelly, and touched by David Faure and Auréli

KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

Hi all, i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned frameworks licenses. Details in the links bellow (basically, certain files are not licensed as per contained license). Should those files be r

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kde4support_master_qt5 #32

On Friday 24 of January 2014 09:53:00 Ben Cooksley wrote: > There has been no changes in regards to the compiler, etc. on > build.kde.org in the past few weeks. > The only thing that could have changed would be the version of CMake - > as we follow the 'next' branch, so this could be a CMake regres

Re: Compiling Plasma-Framework with a QT5 compiled with -egl -opengl es2

On Monday 14 of October 2013 16:40:03 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > it shouldn't require es2. It's obvious that it needs egl, but it shouldn't > need es2. If it does that would be clearly an upstream bug. KWin 4.11 for > Wayland requires egl, but doesn't work with es2. ... > What if you add the -egl and