Review Request 127657: Improve the layout of the BrowserOpenOrSaveQuestion dialogue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127657/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. Repository: kparts D

Re: Review Request 127345: Make it possible for an applet to offer a test object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127345/#review94644 --- src/plasma/corona.cpp (line 179)

Review Request 127655: Fix KAboutData::applicationData() to sync to current Q*Application metadata

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127655/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcoreaddons Description

Re: Please add new versions on bugs.kde.org products on KF5 releases

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:09 PM, David Faure wrote: > One following issue remains: > there is no frameworks-krunner bugzilla product. There is a krunner product, > but it's not the same > thing, it's not KF5-versionned. Should we add one? Who would be the > maintainer? > (the yaml file points to

Re: Review Request 127606: [kunitconversion] If we don't know a conversion rate, inform the client instead of guessing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127606/ --- (Updated April 15, 2016, 1:20 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 127606: [kunitconversion] If we don't know a conversion rate, inform the client instead of guessing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127606/#review94636 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kai Uwe Broulik On April 7, 2016, 1

Re: Taking over KRunner maintainership

Hi Kai, Great news! Strangely enough, this is something I talked to Marco about during the CERN sprint, so it is nice to see that you are the maintainer both defacto and de jure :) As far as the architecture is concerned (Sprinter, or something else), that is probably worth looking into. I was pl

Jenkins-kde-ci: plasma-framework master kf5-qt5 » Linux,NoX11,gcc - Build # 21 - Still Unstable!

GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=NoX11,compiler=gcc/21/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=NoX11,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:35:36 + Build duration: 10 min CHANGE SET Revision 794

Jenkins-kde-ci: plasma-framework master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,NoX11,gcc - Build # 20 - Still Unstable!

GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=NoX11,compiler=gcc/20/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=NoX11,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:35:36 + Build duration: 8 min 29 sec CHANGE SET

Jenkins-kde-ci: plasma-framework master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux,All,gcc - Build # 20 - Still Unstable!

GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc/20/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:35:36 + Build duration: 3 min 14 sec CHANGE SET Rev

Jenkins-kde-ci: plasma-framework master kf5-qt5 » Linux,All,gcc - Build # 21 - Still Unstable!

GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc/21/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:35:36 + Build duration: 2 min 58 sec CHANGE SET Revision 7

Review Request for KWayland for inclusion in frameworks

Hi frameworks-developers, based on the thread "KWayland as framework" [1] I want to start the review process for including KWayland into frameworks. To make it easier I'm giving an overview: Policies [2]: * Tier 1/integration - dependencies on Qt::Gui (5.4) and Wayland (1.7) * directory structur