We thank you for fixing your build!___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
We thank you for fixing your build!___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Check console output at
https://build.kde.org/job/kdoctools%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=OSX,compiler=clang/8/
to view the results.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
Check console output at
https://build.kde.org/job/kdoctools%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=OSX,compiler=clang/10/
to view the results.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frame
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123946/#review80988
---
+1 for the api addition.
However, the naming of the api addit
Check console output at
https://build.kde.org/job/kauth%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=OSX,compiler=clang/2/
to view the results.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-fra
Check console output at
https://build.kde.org/job/kauth%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=OSX,compiler=clang/2/
to view the results.
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123951/
---
(Updated May 30, 2015, 2:26 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and K
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123951/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and KDEPIM.
Repository: kpeople
Descr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123946/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Thomas Pfeiffer.
Repository
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123438/
---
(Updated May 30, 2015, 5:15 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
> On May 29, 2015, 7:26 p.m., Kåre Särs wrote:
> > Having a static cache sounds reasonable to me and I think it might be a
> > good change, but I'll let people with more experience with sonnet give the
> > thumbs up or down.
> >
> > Meanwhile I wonder why ktexteditor calls
> > m_backgroundChe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123930/
---
(Updated May 30, 2015, 5:13 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and M
> On May 29, 2015, 6:15 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, usability wise. Miss an icon by one
> > pixel, and the effect is to go up, making the whole set of icons disappear?
>
> Ashish Bansal wrote:
> Well about usability there's already discussion going on dolp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123929/
---
(Updated May 30, 2015, 12:42 p.m.)
Review request for Dolphin, KDE Framew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123940/
---
(Updated May 30, 2015, 2:39 p.m.)
Review request for Dolphin, KDE Framewo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123940/#review80967
---
Ship it!
Looks good otherwise. :)
src/widgets/dropjob.cpp (
> On May 29, 2015, 12:45 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, usability wise. Miss an icon by one
> > pixel, and the effect is to go up, making the whole set of icons disappear?
>
> Ashish Bansal wrote:
> Well about usability there's already discussion going on dol
> On May 29, 2015, 12:45 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, usability wise. Miss an icon by one
> > pixel, and the effect is to go up, making the whole set of icons disappear?
>
> Ashish Bansal wrote:
> Well about usability there's already discussion going on dol
> On May 29, 2015, 12:45 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I'm not sure this is a good idea, usability wise. Miss an icon by one
> > pixel, and the effect is to go up, making the whole set of icons disappear?
>
> Ashish Bansal wrote:
> Well about usability there's already discussion going on dol
20 matches
Mail list logo
