---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123514/
---
(Updated May 3, 2015, 11:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123551/
---
(Updated May 3, 2015, 10:43 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
> On May 3, 2015, 10:21 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > This sounds like something that should go into KF 5.10.
> >
> > If this is temporary code then doing it "only if new-style plugins haven't
> > been found" doesn't really matter much IMHO.
Yes, that's the idea.
- Aleix
---
> On mai. 3, 2015, 12:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I'm confused, the title say "Remove KAboutData" and then goes and changes
> > i18n while breaking it?
> >
> > I mean i18n handling is relatively easy, and we have pretty good
> > documentation at
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Developm
> On May 3, 2015, 2:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I'm confused, the title say "Remove KAboutData" and then goes and changes
> > i18n while breaking it?
> >
> > I mean i18n handling is relatively easy, and we have pretty good
> > documentation at
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Developmen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123551/#review79808
---
Ship it!
This sounds like something that should go into KF 5.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123601/#review79797
---
Why not at least allow people to write 3 shortcuts in a .rc fi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123601/
---
(Updated May 3, 2015, 2:46 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Bug
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123601/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Bugs: 343665
https://bugs.kde.org/
Hey,
> Or the other way around -- if it is at one point indeed working with these
> versions, what will happen is that someone will use a new feature from an
> underlying framework at some point, and forget to upgrade the required
> version. This will happen many times per month, not just once a y
Hi David,
I just commited a fix for the unit tests.
> In fact, is tests/kmoretoolstest supposed to be a unittest ?
It has both unittests and interactive dialogs in it. The interactive dialogs
can be
disabled via a flag but I guess I should separate this more cleanly.
> but releasing something
El Dijous, 30 d'abril de 2015, a les 10:35:59, Kevin Funk va escriure:
> On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 21:43:20 David Faure wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 April 2015 11:24:48 Kevin Funk wrote:
> > > Use-case: Potential contributor working on KDevelop:
> > > - Has KF5 installed from distro packages
> > >
Hi,
I would like to add that there are other much bigger frameworks which have a
lot more
resources at hand and also have one single version under which all of the many
submodules
are released:
Java (Java 6, Java 7, Java 8, ...)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_version_history
.NET (3.0, 3.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123598/
---
(Updated May 3, 2015, 12:39 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review79794
---
I'm confused, the title say "Remove KAboutData" and then goes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123598/#review79793
---
Ship it!
Thanks!
- David Faure
On May 3, 2015, 12:05 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123598/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kio
Desc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123567/
---
(Updated May 3, 2015, 9:30 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mark
On Sunday 03 May 2015 09:11:53 Gregor Mi wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I just commited a fix for the unit tests.
>
> > In fact, is tests/kmoretoolstest supposed to be a unittest ?
>
> It has both unittests and interactive dialogs in it. The interactive dialogs
> can be disabled via a flag but I guess I
19 matches
Mail list logo
