Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

Hello, I've been summoned by CCing, loose all hope! :-) On Sunday 04 January 2015 11:23:49 David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:02:18 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > - If it's effectively GPL-licensed, it should not be a proper Framework > > I would like to challenge this reasoning. >

Re: Review Request 121838: Fix KCoreConfigSkeleton when toggling a value with saves in between

> On Jan. 4, 2015, 12:02 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > This undoes 4846b50aea0bc2262238963a85ab3556c22412e4 > > (https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/), basically. > > > > However looking back at the discussions with Alexander Richardson, this > > might be only a revert of the part that wen

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

On Monday, January 05, 2015 19:04:43 David Faure wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2015 16:11:21 David Edmundson wrote: > > Maybe we could all agree to let Kevin Krammer (as I understand it, the > > current head of frameworks) to make a tough executive decision based on > > the > > thoughts people have

Re: Review Request 121861: Remove obsolate class KFileSystemWatcher, which is handled by Windows implementation of Qt5 QFileSystemWatcher.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121861/ --- (Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 10:18 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 121861: Remove obsolate class KFileSystemWatcher, which is handled by Windows implementation of Qt5 QFileSystemWatcher.

> On Jan. 5, 2015, 9:37 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > Ah cool, I didn't know the Qt5 implementation of QFSW solved this. Nice. > > Ralf Habacker wrote: > The motivation for KFileSystemWatcher is the following limitation: > > * the maximum number of object handles is MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJ

Re: Review Request 121861: Remove obsolate class KFileSystemWatcher, which is handled by Windows implementation of Qt5 QFileSystemWatcher.

> On Jan. 5, 2015, 10:37 nachm., David Faure wrote: > > Ah cool, I didn't know the Qt5 implementation of QFSW solved this. Nice. The motivation for KFileSystemWatcher is the following limitation: * the maximum number of object handles is MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS (64) per thread. * "To wait on mor

Re: Review Request 121861: Remove obsolate class KFileSystemWatcher, which is handled by Windows implementation of Qt5 QFileSystemWatcher.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121861/#review73207 --- Ship it! Ah cool, I didn't know the Qt5 implementation of QFS

Re: Review Request 121865: Fix cross compile error caused by using upper case Windows.h include header file name.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121865/ --- (Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 8:01 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 121865: Fix cross compile error caused by using upper case Windows.h include header file name.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121865/ --- (Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 9 nachm.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Sum

Re: Review Request 121865: Fix cross compile error using Windows.h instead correctly windows.h.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121865/#review73199 --- Ship it! the commit log is a bit confusing though. Did you me

Re: Review Request 121838: Fix KCoreConfigSkeleton when toggling a value with saves in between

> On gen. 4, 2015, 5:02 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > This undoes 4846b50aea0bc2262238963a85ab3556c22412e4 > > (https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/), basically. > > > > However looking back at the discussions with Alexander Richardson, this > > might be only a revert of the part that went

Re: Review Request 121838: Fix KCoreConfigSkeleton when toggling a value with saves in between

> On Jan. 4, 2015, 12:02 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > This undoes 4846b50aea0bc2262238963a85ab3556c22412e4 > > (https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117010/), basically. > > > > However looking back at the discussions with Alexander Richardson, this > > might be only a revert of the part that wen

Review Request 121865: Fix cross compile error using Windows.h instead correctly windows.h.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121865/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: karchive Description ---

Review Request 121861: Remove obsolate class KFileSystemWatcher, which is handled by Windows implementation of Qt5 QFileSystemWatcher.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121861/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcoreaddons Description

Review Request 121864: Get rid of KDBusMenuExporter and use DBusMenuExporter directly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121864/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: knotifications Descripti

Plasma NM 5.1.2.1

plasma-nm has gained an extra release, 5.1.2.1, which updates it to use networkmanager-qt (the new name of libnm-qt) 5.6.0 which is due to be released with the KDE Frameworks 5 release tomorrow. It will not compile with libnm-qt as released with Plasma 5.1.x, just keep using plasma-nm 5.1.2 is yo

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

On Monday 05 January 2015 16:11:21 David Edmundson wrote: > Maybe we could all agree to let Kevin Krammer (as I understand it, the > current head of frameworks) to make a tough executive decision based on the > thoughts people have had here so we can move forwards with making sure it > gets release

Re: Compile KF5 into Docker

Hi Mathieu, you might want to team up with Ben's sok student Scarlett, who also has been busying herself successfully with docker on Linux, Windows and OSX in the last weeks!!! Greets, Marko ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kd

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

On Monday, January 05, 2015 16:11:21 David Edmundson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Monday, January 05, 2015 14:32:32 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > say > > > > > Great. We have somewhat of a consens

Re: Split kde-baseapps?

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:27 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2014 18:26:22 David Narvaez wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure wrote: > > > If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to > that. > > > > How should this be done? Can I just co

Re: Review Request 121862: Move the kglobalaccel runtime into the framework

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121862/#review73173 --- This won't be in KF 5.6, which is already tagged, while this i

Review Request 121862: Move the kglobalaccel runtime into the framework

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121862/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure, Martin Gräßlin, and Hrvoje

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Monday, January 05, 2015 14:32:32 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > > Are we going to shoot ourselves in the foot (= making our lives more > > > > complicated, by having a dependency

Re: Replacement for KMimeType::isBinaryData?

On Monday 05 January 2015 15:04:48 David Faure wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2015 12:39:36 Milian Wolff wrote: > > In KDevelop, we support file/project templates. These are archives of > > files > > that may contain placeholders that will get replaced with user input when > > a > > file/project is

Re: Review Request 121852: Fix cross compile error not using the correct case for windows api include file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121852/ --- (Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 3:39 nachm.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

On Monday, January 05, 2015 14:32:32 Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > Are we going to shoot ourselves in the foot (= making our lives more > > > complicated, by having a dependency that works differently from the > > > other > > > dependencies an

Re: Replacement for KMimeType::isBinaryData?

On Monday 05 January 2015 12:39:36 Milian Wolff wrote: > In KDevelop, we support file/project templates. These are archives of files > that may contain placeholders that will get replaced with user input when a > file/project is created from a template. This replacement can only work on > non-binar

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > Are we going to shoot ourselves in the foot (= making our lives more > > complicated, by having a dependency that works differently from the other > > dependencies and has to be released separately) just so that we can say > "all > > fra

Re: Baloo Framework - License Exception

Hi, On Sunday, January 04, 2015 11:23:49 David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:02:18 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > - If it's effectively GPL-licensed, it should not be a proper Framework > > I would like to challenge this reasoning. > > It seems to me that the premise is: > * we need

Re: Review Request 121850: Port KRunner to categorized logging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/ --- (Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 12:20 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 121850: Port KRunner to categorized logging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/#review73136 --- Ship it! src/declarative/krunner_debug.h

Re: Replacement for KMimeType::isBinaryData?

On Sunday 04 January 2015 12:12:24 David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 29 October 2014 00:30:04 Kevin Funk wrote: > > Heya, > > > > I didn't find a suitable replacement for KMimeType::isBinaryData in KF5. > > Is > > there some? > > > > http://lxr.kde.org/ident?v=kf5-qt5&_i=isBinaryData&_remember=1

Re: Review Request 121850: Port KRunner to categorized logging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/ --- (Updated Gen. 5, 2015, 9:45 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plas

Re: Review Request 121850: Port KRunner to categorized logging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/ --- (Updated Gen. 5, 2015, 9:41 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plas

Re: Review Request 121850: Port KRunner to categorized logging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/ --- (Updated Gen. 5, 2015, 9:41 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and V

Review Request 121850: Port KRunner to categorized logging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121850/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Vishesh Handa. Bugs: 342491

Re: Split kde-baseapps?

On Wednesday 12 November 2014 18:26:22 David Narvaez wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:46 PM, David Faure wrote: > > If it's useful to share it, let's share it, I have no objection to that. > > How should this be done? Can I just copy things around and post a RR > or should be this moved around