---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/
---
(Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 7:54 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/#review68181
---
Ship it!
I am pretty sure this is fine.
- Albert Astals Cid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120535/
---
(Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 12:02 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120387/
---
(Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 4:30 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
> On Oct. 8, 2014, 9:22 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > According to
> > https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
> > "changing the const/volatile qualifiers of the function" is BIC
> >
> > Now the thing is if we allow BIC changes in frameworks like attica or n
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120539/#review68114
---
Ship it!
Alternatively, the count could be set at runtime (ei
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120539/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and kwin.
Bugs: 339771
https://bugs
