Le mardi 26 août 2014 11:50:50 Kevin Ottens a écrit :
> > kpimidentities
>
> Maybe deserves a better name? kidentitymanagement?
Done.
> > kpimtextedit
>
> I suspect it could get a better name, but couldn't decide yet. :-)
> Also I wonder if some of it could/should go in ktexteditor? But I don't
On Sunday 17 August 2014 00:03:41 David Faure wrote:
> kio_trash is currently in kde-workspace/kio-extras, but KIO actually offers
> API that depends on kio_trash (KIO::trash(), JobUiDelegateExtension::Trash,
> support for trash in FileUndoManager, and I'm about to add a
> KIO::restoreFromTrash job
Hi Albert, Ben and Aleix,
On 27 Aug 2014, at 22:19 , Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> As I already said, I don't think it's worth for you building things that
> don't
> have Linux CI [unless you can work on fixing them, but I think you said it
> was
> not part of your skills].
hmmm, okay. Well, I’
El Dimecres, 27 d'agost de 2014, a les 19:56:17, Marko Käning va escriure:
> Hi David,
>
> On 27 Aug 2014, at 12:53 , David Edmundson
wrote:
> > It's known it's not finished being ported.
>
> Not to me.
As I already said, I don't think it's worth for you building things that don't
have Linux
On 26 August 2014 11:41, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>
> I'd like to suggest taking the opportunity to remove uses of the quite ugly
> term PIM in favour of the friendlier Kontact.
I would say no. PIM in library names makes sense, especially as we
want that others outside KDE-PIM / Kontact will use
My general 2c: I'm with Kevin that we should do functional and api
reviews, move code around, and generally refactor stuff *before* we
split anything. It's just plain easier that way. I don't think we're
anywhere near close to knowing what to do with everything to be
splitting things yet. Will we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119958/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kio
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119901/#review65382
---
Nice! See my comments below, though.
kde-modules/KDEInstallD
Hi David,
On 27 Aug 2014, at 12:53 , David Edmundson wrote:
> It's known it's not finished being ported.
Not to me.
Where would I find a place with information about the porting state of the
various KDE libs?
I know there is one for kdeedu, which Aleix pointed out to me a while ago [1].
Somethi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119901/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2014, 6:41 p.m.)
Review request for Build System and KD
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119895/
---
(Updated Aug. 27, 2014, 12:42 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119895/#review65352
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Krammer
On Aug. 22, 2014, 10:55
It's known it's not finished being ported.
I started porting this, as I needed it for Gwenview.
I got stuck on the Threadweaver porting, so at the time just made it
an optional dependency in Gwenview instead.
It's on my TODO list, though feel free to help out.
David.
___
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119895/#review65350
---
So what do I do ?
- Laurent Montel
On août 22, 2014, 10:55
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi Aleix,
>
> On 26 Aug 2014, at 12:18 , Aleix Pol wrote:
> > libkdcraw is not a KDE Framework anyway, you probably want to tell the
> Digikam mailing lists.
>
> hmmm, I just verified again that it has a frameworks branch.
>
> OK, so a fram
Hi Aleix,
On 26 Aug 2014, at 12:18 , Aleix Pol wrote:
> libkdcraw is not a KDE Framework anyway, you probably want to tell the
> Digikam mailing lists.
hmmm, I just verified again that it has a frameworks branch.
OK, so a frameworks branch alone doesn't mean that a project is already
framewor
> On Aug. 26, 2014, 2:21 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > +1 looks good to me.
> >
> > Maybe a before/after screenshot would help in these reviews.
>
> Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
> sorry. Will add
> (being lazy)
>
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
> You may wish to examine System Settings
17 matches
Mail list logo
