Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 9 July 2014 17:14, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi Kevin, > > On Wednesday 09 July 2014 09:57:27 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On 9 July 2014 03:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > * ervin hopes to see kdepimlibs bits getting in sooner rather than later; >> >> Hmm? Sysadmin has already received a request

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

Hello, On Wednesday 09 July 2014 09:57:27 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On 9 July 2014 03:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > * ervin hopes to see kdepimlibs bits getting in sooner rather than later; > > Hmm? Sysadmin has already received a request to get the frameworks > branch of kdepimlibs building on the C

Re: Fix signal/Slot in kcmutils/dialog

On Wednesday 09 July 2014 00:36:27 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Tuesday 08 July 2014 22:10:10 laurent Montel wrote: > > Hi, > > In qt4 it was a KDialog so okClicked() and applyClicked() existed. > > Now it’s a KPageDialog => a QDialog so we must to connect to > > QDialogButtonBox. > > > > This patch fixe

Re: Review Request 119186: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KEMOTICONS_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119186/ --- (Updated July 8, 2014, 10:54 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 119189: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KCOMPLETION_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119189/ --- (Updated July 8, 2014, 10:51 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 21:51:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61935 > ---

Re: Translations in frameworks released tarballs

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 23:24:36 Christoph Feck wrote: > On Tuesday 08 July 2014 07:56:17 Alexander Potashev wrote: > > 2014-07-08 3:01 GMT+04:00 Christoph Feck : > > > Is there a way to detect and strip unused strings in the release > > > tarballs? > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > Quick googling gi

Re: Fix signal/Slot in kcmutils/dialog

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 22:10:10 laurent Montel wrote: > Hi, > In qt4 it was a KDialog so okClicked() and applyClicked() existed. > Now it’s a KPageDialog => a QDialog so we must to connect to > QDialogButtonBox. > > This patch fixes bad signal. > > Can I commit it ? > > Thanks Ship it! I'd sa

Re: Review Request 119186: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KEMOTICONS_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119186/#review61946 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On July 8, 2014, 9:

Re: Review Request 119186: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KEMOTICONS_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119186/#review61945 --- Ship it! - David Faure On July 8, 2014, 9:10 p.m., David Gi

Re: Review Request 119189: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KCOMPLETION_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119189/#review61943 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On July 8, 2014, 10:09 p.m

Re: Review Request 119189: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KCOMPLETION_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119189/#review61944 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On July 8, 2014, 10

Review Request 119189: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KCOMPLETION_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119189/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcompletion Description

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 9 July 2014 03:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi Kevin, > > This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on > #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, fregl, mgraesslin, notmart, > PovAddict, Riddell, sandsmark, tosky

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 9 July 2014 04:05, Mario Fux wrote: > Am Dienstag, 08. Juli 2014, 17.30:19 schrieb Kevin Ottens: >> Hello everyone, > > Morning Hi Mario, > >> This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held >> on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > [snip] > >> * unormal is looking fo

Re: Review Request 119111: Make FindGettext compatible with the one provided by CMake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119111/#review61935 --- I know i'm late, but if CMake provides one, can't we just kill

Re: Deprecation Defines

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 23:14:54 David Gil Oliva wrote: > AFAICS, KCompletion is already clean. ./src/ksortablelist.h:136:#ifndef KDE_NO_DEPRECATED -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5 ___ Kde-frameworks-

Re: Translations in frameworks released tarballs

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 07:56:17 Alexander Potashev wrote: > 2014-07-08 3:01 GMT+04:00 Christoph Feck : > > Is there a way to detect and strip unused strings in the release > > tarballs? > > Hi Christoph, > > Quick googling gives this: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8149435/how-to-delete-ob

Re: Deprecation Defines

Hi! 2014-07-07 23:39 GMT+02:00 David Faure : > On Monday 05 May 2014 13:14:07 Alex Merry wrote: > > On 05/05/14 07:27, Matthew Dawson wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I was looking into my frameworks, to prepare them for the 5.0. One > thing > > > was looking into was the deprecation defines.

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

Am Dienstag, 08. Juli 2014, 19.27:52 schrieb John Layt: Morning John [snip] > > * he'd like to see a donation button in KDE apps based on KF5 > > (developers > > > > could opt-out); > > We already have a link to the donations page buried deep in the "About > KDE" dialog under the "Support KD

Review Request 119186: Change KDE_NO_DEPRECATED to KEMOTICONS_NO_DEPRECATED

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119186/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kemoticons Description -

Re: Deprecation Defines

On July 8, 2014 10:50:18 PM David Faure wrote: > > I agree. I figured the first step was to come up with a draft policy and > > post to the list for comments, and as I said I'm trying to get a new > > contributer to help (they have lots of experience writing documents, and > > have a strong techni

Re: Deprecation Defines

(moving this to kde-buildsystem) On Tuesday 08 July 2014 10:47:21 Matthew Dawson wrote: > On July 8, 2014 11:20:37 AM David Faure wrote: > > > I have a patch sitting in review for kconfig. > > > > What's the RR number? I can't see it in my k-f-d folder. > > 118489. It already has comments on it

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, John Layt wrote: We already have a link to the donations page buried deep in the "About KDE" dialog under the "Support KDE" tab where no-one ever sees it. A Help menu item for "Donate to KDE..." that pops up a dialog explaining why would be far more visible, but easily disab

Fix signal/Slot in kcmutils/dialog

Hi, In qt4 it was a KDialog so okClicked() and applyClicked() existed. Now it’s a KPageDialog => a QDialog so we must to connect to QDialogButtonBox. This patch fixes bad signal. Can I commit it ? Thanks -- Laurent Montel | laurent.mon...@kdab.com | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Franc

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 18:27:52 John Layt wrote: > Here's a bit of bike-shedding for you: when creating completely new > Frameworks in Tier 1, do we name them with a Q or with a K or with > something completely neutral? Not really a bike-shedding topic hopefully... We had the case already and we

Re: Review Request 119043: pollkit-qt-1 buildsystem adjustements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119043/#review61923 --- Build is failing now when BUILD_EXAMPLES is turned on. - Mich

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On Tuesday 08 July 2014 17:30:19 Kevin Ottens wrote: > * he's also like to see the android port progress, in particular he got no > answer about getting a file in ECM to that effect; Sorry, life's a bit crazy at the mo. Will try to look at soon. Although I'd appreciate the input of anyone else wi

online kanban/todo list

Hi all, since it's time to schedule "what we want to do in the next release", and the postit boards are so useful during sprints.. I was brought to attention of this thing (thanks Kevin, Aaron;): http://kanboard.net/ it's very simple, very similar to trello, free software and could be ran on KDE

Re: Deprecation Defines

On July 8, 2014 11:20:37 AM David Faure wrote: > > > > I have a patch sitting in review for kconfig. > > What's the RR number? I can't see it in my k-f-d folder. 118489. It already has comments on it, with the decision that policy needs to be figured out before it is pushed. > > > I'm waiting

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

On 8 July 2014 16:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > * he'd like our documentation to improve, we're really behind alternatives in > that regard; Seconded, especially from the point-of-view of external devs. For example, someone today was asking about KArchive and whether it was fully standalone or depe

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

> * he's not sold on the no branches policy, actually plasma-framework seeing > heavy work he pushed feature branches already (said policy isn't written > anywhere BTW); I've quite confused on this. Whyever would you not want feature branches? Jonathan

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

Am Dienstag, 08. Juli 2014, 17.30:19 schrieb Kevin Ottens: > Hello everyone, Morning > This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. [snip] > * unormal is looking forward to more mac CI results; > * the windows CI is a bit stuck;

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w28

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 28 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: agateau, apol, d_ed, dfaure, fregl, mgraesslin, notmart, PovAddict, Riddell, sandsmark, tosky, unormal, vHanda and myself. Announcements: * KF 5.0 got offic

Re: Review Request 119079: Add utility function for loading all plugins from a given dir + easy accessor for metadata

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119079/ --- (Updated Juli 8, 2014, 1:51 nachm.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Re: [OSX/Qt5/KF5/KDE CI system] - libksysguard currently broken on master branch

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 08 Jul 2014, at 01:15 , Aleix Pol wrote: > > Well, you'd get an application for managing processes, it's cool, but > then you need to provide a backend for it. > yep > > > IMHO, you have projects much more interesting to port than ksysguar

Re: Deprecation Defines

On Monday 07 July 2014 15:48:26 Matthew Dawson wrote: > On July 7, 2014 11:39:38 PM David Faure wrote: > > On Monday 05 May 2014 13:14:07 Alex Merry wrote: > > > On 05/05/14 07:27, Matthew Dawson wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I was looking into my frameworks, to prepare them for the 5.0.

Re: Review Request 119165: store the containment as a qpointer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119165/ --- (Updated July 8, 2014, 9:05 a.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 119165: store the containment as a qpointer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119165/ --- (Updated July 8, 2014, 9:03 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plas

Re: Review Request 119165: store the containment as a qpointer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119165/#review61879 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Edmundson On July 8, 2014, 8:36

Re: Review Request 119165: store the containment as a qpointer

> On July 7, 2014, 10:37 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > src/scriptengines/qml/plasmoid/containmentinterface.cpp, line 99 > > > > > > If the containment is removed before the containmentInterface (the > > cause

Re: Review Request 119165: store the containment as a qpointer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119165/ --- (Updated July 8, 2014, 8:36 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plas

Re: Review Request 119165: store the containment as a qpointer

> On July 7, 2014, 10:37 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > src/scriptengines/qml/plasmoid/containmentinterface.cpp, line 99 > > > > > > If the containment is removed before the containmentInterface (the > > cause

Re: Review Request 119152: Do not define QT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119152/#review61876 --- Ah. QT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE defaults to QT_VERSION_CHECK(