Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

Hello, On Wednesday 09 April 2014 18:33:38 Alex Merry wrote: > I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's > long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it > on RB, but the gist is: > > kde4support -> kdelibs4support > KDE4SUPPORT -> KDELIBS4SUPP

Re: Review Request 117454: Implement KUser::faceIconPath for Windows XP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117454/#review55319 --- Ship it! Looks good, but hopefully we can drop XP support soo

Re: Review Request 117440: Make sure that common licenses are accessed throught help:/ protocol

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117440/#review55316 --- This review has been submitted with commit 60b2ed0e85ed42b728

Re: Review Request 117440: Make sure that common licenses are accessed throught help:/ protocol

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117440/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 11:14 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 10:53 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/#review55315 --- This review has been submitted with commit e6793e03a3c5ac6237

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/#review55314 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On April 9, 2014, 1

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 10:41 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/#review55313 --- CMakeLists.txt

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hi, Sure I think they are, I am asking all those questions about dependencies and implications of adding the libraries to KF5 because of that too. I just want to make sure the other developers still think the same. I did not make that decision alone back in 2011 in Madrid. I think they are useful

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Ok, so let's go make a better NMQt/MMQt :-) Lamarque V. Souza KDE's Network Management maintainer http://planetkde.org/pt-br On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Jan Grulich wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 09 of April 2014 07:20 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tuesday 08 April 2014 19:51:

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

On 09/04/14 20:07, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 19:33:20 Alex Merry wrote: >> On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote: >>> What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all >>> KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support? >> >> Yes, that's what the changes I've g

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

On Wednesday 09 April 2014 19:33:20 Alex Merry wrote: > On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote: > > What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all > > KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support? > > Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up require. wouldn't it be possible

Re: kdeinit5 binary and man page in different repos

On 09/04/14 19:34, Alex Merry wrote: > On 09/04/14 19:08, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that kdeinit5 is in kinit, and its man page appears to be in >> kservice. I guess the man page should be moved, but I'm not sure of the >> best procedure with regards to preserving history etc.

Review Request 117457: kio-extras: minor dependencies cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117457/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aleix Pol Gonzalez. Repository: kio

Re: kdeinit5 binary and man page in different repos

On 09/04/14 19:08, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that kdeinit5 is in kinit, and its man page appears to be in > kservice. I guess the man page should be moved, but I'm not sure of the > best procedure with regards to preserving history etc. Huh, so it is. *Adds it to his TODO list*

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

On 09/04/14 18:38, Aleix Pol wrote: > What happens with the cmake side? are we going to have to rename all > KF5::KDE4Support for KF5::KDELibs4Support? Yes, that's what the changes I've got queued up require. Alex ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list

kdeinit5 binary and man page in different repos

Hi, I noticed that kdeinit5 is in kinit, and its man page appears to be in kservice. I guess the man page should be moved, but I'm not sure of the best procedure with regards to preserving history etc. Best regards, Michael ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mai

Re: KDE(Libs)4Support rename

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's > long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it > on RB, but the gist is: > > kde4support -> kdelibs4support > KDE4SUPPORT -> KDELIBS4SUPPORT > KDE4S

KDE(Libs)4Support rename

I have a local commit renaming kde4support to kdelibs4support. It's long and tedious and repetitive, so I don't see much point in putting it on RB, but the gist is: kde4support -> kdelibs4support KDE4SUPPORT -> KDELIBS4SUPPORT KDE4Support -> KDELibs4Support KDE4 Support -> KDELibs 4 Support (eg:

Auto-restarting of DBus Services

Hi all, kglobalacceld has the following piece of code: // Restart on a crash KCrash::setFlags(KCrash::AutoRestart); Now I'm wondering whether this is needed at all. After all it's a DBus service and should get auto-restarted (or at least started when next accessed), shouldn't it? Cheers Marti

Review Request 117454: Implement KUser::faceIconPath for Windows XP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117454/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcoreaddons Description

Re: kcoreaddons: is src/mimetypes/kde.xml still in use?

Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2014, 06:59:08 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau: > Hi, > > I am trying to figure out which code is responsible for loading > xml_mimetypes.po. This file is produced by scripty when running on > kcoreaddons, but I can't find any code actually loading the catalog. Is > my git grep fu to

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

Am Mittwoch, 09. April 2014, 15.05:06 schrieb Kevin Funk: Morning Valorie, Kevin and Co Thanks for bringing this topic up again. > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > > Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your > > Frameworks book, now is the

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117132/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 4 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Albert

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

On Wednesday 09 April 2014 15:42:47 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Funk wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > > > Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your > > > Frameworks book, now is the time to step forwar

kcoreaddons: is src/mimetypes/kde.xml still in use?

Hi, I am trying to figure out which code is responsible for loading xml_mimetypes.po. This file is produced by scripty when running on kcoreaddons, but I can't find any code actually loading the catalog. Is my git grep fu too weak? Aurélien ___ Kde-fram

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Funk wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > > Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your > > Frameworks book, now is the time to step forward. > > > > Here are some things to think about: > > > > Most

Re: Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:25:18 Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your > Frameworks book, now is the time to step forward. > > Here are some things to think about: > > Most of this book is already written somewhere. When the words have

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

On 08/04/14 23:51, Lamarque Souza wrote: > Hi, > > I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to > do to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt > part of KF5. The other doubt I still have is where > _kde_add_platform_definitions is defined. By wh

Re: Kioslave repos

On Wednesday 09 April 2014 11:57:37 Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > I'm against having anything in plasma-* without maintainer and even less > > if > > it is something that is known to have bugs (many) in KDE4. > > > > So we wither split it and hope somebo

Re: Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2014 16:06:32 Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld > from > > > kde- > > > runtime into th

Re: Kioslave repos

On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > I'm against having anything in plasma-* without maintainer and even less if > it is something that is known to have bugs (many) in KDE4. > > So we wither split it and hope somebody will give love to it or remove it. Not talking about that repo in

Re: Review Request 117440: Make sure that common licenses are accessed throught help:/ protocol

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117440/#review55266 --- Ship it! Works for me, thanks - Burkhard Lück On April 8,

Re: Kioslave repos

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 17:37:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Good move. > > Pushed me toward looking a bit closer to this page, as obviously we didn't > look close enough before (sorry about that), I might have a concern still: > solid-deviceautomounter getting its own repository. It looks again like a

Writing a Frameworks book at Randa

Hello folks, I know that August is months away, but if you want your Frameworks book, now is the time to step forward. Here are some things to think about: Most of this book is already written somewhere. When the words have already been written down, all we need do is gather and arrange them. Whe

Re: Review Request 117016: Allow overriding DrKonqi lookup directories by PATH

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117016/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 10:47 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Re: Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Friday 04 April 2014 16:06:32 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > similar as to what we already have with DrKonqi moving kglobalacceld from > > kde- > > runtime into the globalaccel framework would significantly raise the tier > > and > > de

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

> On March 28, 2014, 4:43 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > Looks wrong, QLocale looks at .ts/.qm files while we mostly use .po/.gmo > > files - different translation system. > > > > Also doubly wrong because uiLanguages() returns the user preferences (e.g. > > for me "en, fr"), which has nothing t