Re: Kioslave repos

Hello, On Monday 07 April 2014 23:27:33 Alex Merry wrote: > Aleix wanted a separate thread for this, so here it is. > > The current runtime splitting plan says that ioslaves should be in three > places: core ones (file, http, etc) in kio, other useful ones (archive, > bookmarks, etc) in "kioslave

Re: Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

Hello, On Monday 07 April 2014 18:57:25 Aleix Pol wrote: > We started the discussion of splitting some time where we somewhat agreed > on a splitting plan [1]. I've been working during the last week on it, and > decided I'd send an e-mail with some update on the status. Most things that > haven't

Re: Review Request 117333: Remove Solid::Networking usage from KIO

> On April 7, 2014, 3:37 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > src/ioslaves/http/http.cpp, line 1900 > > > > > > What about doing it? :-) > > Àlex Fiestas wrote: > I can do that but in another review if that is ok,

Jenkins build became unstable: kwindowsystem_master_qt5 » All,LINBUILDER #42

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Review Request 117353: Add a unit test for changing window title

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117353/#review55214 --- This review has been submitted with commit 2ed4a2d5905e7243a9

Re: Review Request 117353: Add a unit test for changing window title

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117353/ --- (Updated April 8, 2014, 5:09 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 116881: Fix KUser::groups() and KUser::groupNames() on UNIX

> On April 7, 2014, 3:24 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any news? > > Alexander Richardson wrote: > Still wondering whether I should always use getgrouplist since AFAIK no > platform without it is supported (yet) or should keep the fallback code. Flip a coin if you have too. :) As long as

Re: Kioslave repos

On Mon, April 7, 2014 23:27:33 Alex Merry wrote: > Moving things between repos is a *pain*, and I think Ben and Albert have > a point about being over-eager to split things up. In this case, I > think we should just have core things in kio, and everything else in > kioslaves (or call it kio-extra-

Kioslave repos

Aleix wanted a separate thread for this, so here it is. The current runtime splitting plan says that ioslaves should be in three places: core ones (file, http, etc) in kio, other useful ones (archive, bookmarks, etc) in "kioslaves", and curiosities (cgi, finger) in kioslave-extra. In my view, thi

Re: The kde-workspace split

On Monday 07 April 2014 18:56:06 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > This is what I added into the logical-module-structure: > Is it wrong? No, everything is fine now, Michael Pyne fixed kdesrc-build. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Monday 07 of April 2014 22:30:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:24:44, šumski va escriure: > > On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > > > rele

Re: Review Request 117070: remove check for Linux kernel >= 2.6.14

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117070/#review55208 --- This review has been submitted with commit 8d6c758143cfb5ea16

Re: Review Request 117070: remove check for Linux kernel >= 2.6.14

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117070/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 8:56 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 116881: Fix KUser::groups() and KUser::groupNames() on UNIX

> On April 7, 2014, 5:24 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any news? Still wondering whether I should always use getgrouplist since AFAIK no platform without it is supported (yet) or should keep the fallback code. - Alexander --- This is a

Re: Translation support in Qt-translation-based frameworks

El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 05:05:06, Aurélien Gâteau va escriure: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 15:31, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimecres, 2 d'abril de 2014, a les 07:42:07, Aurélien Gâteau va > > > > escriure: > > > > > Having said that, it is a problem when testing packages for night

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:24:44, šumski va escriure: > On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > >

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > Hi all, > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > frameworks licenses. > ... Last items =) KRunner and KActivities are missing C

Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 21:20:19, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my > >> suggestion is to move it int

Fwd: Proposal: Location hackfest

Hi, Please see the below email from Zeeshan Ali of Gnome and GeoClue who is organising a Location hackfest in London in May/June time-frame to get Gnome, KDE, Qt, Mozilla, Jolla and others working together on improving location services on the Linux desktop. If anyone is interested in attending,

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

> On March 28, 2014, 3:43 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > Looks wrong, QLocale looks at .ts/.qm files while we mostly use .po/.gmo > > files - different translation system. > > > > Also doubly wrong because uiLanguages() returns the user preferences (e.g. > > for me "en, fr"), which has nothing t

Re: Review Request 117125: start_kdeinit: Use capabilities instead of SUID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117125/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 7:05 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

On 7 April 2014 18:57, Aleix Pol wrote: > - l10n, localization: it was decided in this mailing list it would go to > kde4support when some development happens. Otherwise it should go to > KUnitConversion because it's only used there. besides KDE4Support. > Catching up after a couple of weeks awa

Re: Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 07/04/14 17:57, Aleix Pol wrote: > > - kioslaves, kioslaves-extra: I'm waiting to get the respositories, the > > sysadmin team seems to have some concerns. Discussing it at the moment > > (when the time zones let us). > > Question: why two?

Re: Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

On 07/04/14 17:57, Aleix Pol wrote: > - kioslaves, kioslaves-extra: I'm waiting to get the respositories, the > sysadmin team seems to have some concerns. Discussing it at the moment > (when the time zones let us). Question: why two? This means kioslaves split across three repos: kio, kioslaves a

Re: Review Request 117328: Update the docbook

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117328/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 5:01 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117304: Update comment about re-fetching clipboard data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117304/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 5:03 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117304: Update comment about re-fetching clipboard data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117304/#review55193 --- This review has been submitted with commit 33536185a5854e91ca

Re: Review Request 117328: Update the docbook

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117328/#review55192 --- This review has been submitted with commit 211a25365b1b8c416d

Re: The kde-workspace split

This is what I added into the logical-module-structure: "kde/workspace/*" : { "oldstable-qt4": "", "stable-qt4": "", "latest-qt4": "", "kf5-qt5": "master" }, "kde/workspace/kde-workspace" : { "oldstable-qt4": "KDE/4.11", "stab

Status of the KDE Runtime module splitting

Hi, We started the discussion of splitting some time where we somewhat agreed on a splitting plan [1]. I've been working during the last week on it, and decided I'd send an e-mail with some update on the status. Most things that haven't been done yet, are because I don't really know what to do with

Re: Review Request 117333: Remove Solid::Networking usage from KIO

> On April 7, 2014, 3:37 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > src/ioslaves/http/http.cpp, line 1900 > > > > > > What about doing it? :-) I can do that but in another review if that is ok, this is blocking the merge o

Re: Review Request 117122: Cut the dependency between country files and KIO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117122/#review55187 --- This review has been submitted with commit 69a5c5f7c5e9f80684

Re: Review Request 117122: Cut the dependency between country files and KIO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117122/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 4:28 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117391: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117391/#review55179 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 5, 2014, 5:21 p.

Re: Review Request 117391: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117391/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 3:43 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117391: Remove unused dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117391/#review55180 --- This review has been submitted with commit 3b38d57ba38ad5da92

Re: Review Request 117376: fix kded build on Windows

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117376/#review55178 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 4, 2014, 7:43 p.

Re: Review Request 117304: Update comment about re-fetching clipboard data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117304/#review55177 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 3, 2014, 12:17 p

Re: Review Request 117353: Add a unit test for changing window title

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117353/#review55176 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 3, 2014, 7:28 a.

Re: Review Request 117333: Remove Solid::Networking usage from KIO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117333/#review55175 --- src/ioslaves/http/http.cpp

Re: Review Request 117328: Update the docbook

> On April 2, 2014, 11:19 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > There is a quite huge unresolved issue with Sonnet and the documentation: > > Sonnet is Tier 1, KDocTools is Tier 2 (and even if it was Tier 1, the rule > > would forbid its usage) :( Yes, it means we basically don't build it ATM... -

Re: Review Request 117328: Update the docbook

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117328/#review55173 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On April 2, 2014, 11:05 a

Re: Review Request 117122: Cut the dependency between country files and KIO

> On March 31, 2014, 2:38 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Ship It! Any news? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117122/#review54681 ---

Re: Review Request 117070: remove check for Linux kernel >= 2.6.14

> On March 31, 2014, 2:37 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Ship It! Any news? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117070/#review54680 ---

Re: Review Request 117132: Use QLocale for figuring out what languages we're translated into

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117132/#review55170 --- So what do we do with that one? - Kevin Ottens On March 28,

Re: Review Request 117125: start_kdeinit: Use capabilities instead of SUID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117125/#review55169 --- Any news? - Kevin Ottens On March 27, 2014, 7:57 p.m., Hrvo

Re: Review Request 117011: Use bin/../share on Windows as a workaround

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117011/#review55168 --- Any news? - Kevin Ottens On March 23, 2014, 11:28 p.m., And

Re: Review Request 117080: cleanup KDirModelTest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117080/#review55167 --- Any news? - Kevin Ottens On March 26, 2014, 12:13 p.m., Ale

Re: Review Request 116881: Fix KUser::groups() and KUser::groupNames() on UNIX

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116881/#review55166 --- Any news? - Kevin Ottens On March 18, 2014, 8:14 p.m., Alex

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014, at 6:05, Lamarque Souza wrote: > How are they are going to change? The "etc" here is important too. > Remember > that NMQt follows NetworkManager's release numbers, the same is true for > MMQt and ModemManager. That is for simplify things for those who are used > to NetworkMana

Re: Review Request 117392: Rename kdebugdialog to avoid collision

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117392/ --- (Updated April 7, 2014, 2:40 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 117392: Rename kdebugdialog to avoid collision

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117392/#review55157 --- This review has been submitted with commit cdb1baacea4b1f8e60

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Am Montag, 07. April 2014, 14.38:14 schrieb Lamarque Souza: > Hi all, Morning Lamarque > I have cloned ECM git repo and looked at it. I agree that it is small and > it has useful features for NMQt/MMQt. I like the fact that it provides a > FindNetworkManager.cmake. Ok, we can make ECM a hard depe

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

How are they are going to change? The "etc" here is important too. Remember that NMQt follows NetworkManager's release numbers, the same is true for MMQt and ModemManager. That is for simplify things for those who are used to NetworkManager's release number, I prefer to keep that. Is there any docu

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Do you agree also with making libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KDE Frameworks? That means probably change versions, releasing etc. Jan On Monday 07 of April 2014 09:38 Lamarque Souza wrote: > Hi all, > > I have cloned ECM git repo and looked at it. I agree that it is small and > it has useful features for

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014, at 5:38, Lamarque Souza wrote: > Hi all, > > I have cloned ECM git repo and looked at it. I agree that it is small and > it has useful features for NMQt/MMQt. I like the fact that it provides a > FindNetworkManager.cmake. Ok, we can make ECM a hard dependency for > NMQt/MMQt.

Re: Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

Hi all, I have cloned ECM git repo and looked at it. I agree that it is small and it has useful features for NMQt/MMQt. I like the fact that it provides a FindNetworkManager.cmake. Ok, we can make ECM a hard dependency for NMQt/MMQt. My only concern now is the kde-modules that Jan used in NMQt/MM

KDE4 refs in kio and kxmlgui

Hi David, Any chance you could look at the last kio and kxmlgui KDE4 TODOs in http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/KF5.0_Release_Preparation/KDE4_References ? They both need maintainer decisions about whether to attempt to resolve them (at least partially) for KF5, punt them to KF6 or drop t

Re: Translation support in Qt-translation-based frameworks

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 15:31, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimecres, 2 d'abril de 2014, a les 07:42:07, Aurélien Gâteau va > escriure: > > > > Having said that, it is a problem when testing packages for nightly > > > > builds (a much better way to test translations), which I assume are not > > >

Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Monday 07 April 2014 21:20:19 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my > >> suggestion is to move it into plasma-workspace r

Re: Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Monday 07 April 2014 11:12:50 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my > > suggestion is to move it into plasma-workspace repository instead of > > merging with the framework. Please

Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my >> suggestion is to move it into plasma-workspace repository instead of merging >> with the framework. Please no

Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my > suggestion is to move it into plasma-workspace repository instead of merging > with the framework. Please note that with Wayland it will be extremely > difficult to p

Re: Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

On Monday 07 April 2014 10:14:12 David Faure wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2014 09:47:43 Jan Grulich wrote: > > You are still talking about users, but I'm sure that 99% of them will > > install it from distro repositories and because e-c-m is build dependency, > > they won't notice that. For remainin

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

On Monday 07 April 2014 09:47:43 Jan Grulich wrote: > You are still talking about users, but I'm sure that 99% of them will > install it from distro repositories and because e-c-m is build dependency, > they won't notice that. For remaining 1% of users you are talking about > will be e-c-m availabl

Re: libmm-qt/libnm-qt as KF5

You are still talking about users, but I'm sure that 99% of them will install it from distro repositories and because e-c-m is build dependency, they won't notice that. For remaining 1% of users you are talking about will be e-c-m available from distro repositories as well, so what's the problem