Re: Review Request 116740: Fix kdeglobals location in apidox

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116740/#review52701 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On March 11, 2014,

Re: Review Request 116747: Clean up KCompletionBox

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116747/#review52703 --- src/kcompletionbox.h

Re: Review Request 116650: Give unique names to the targets created by KDocToolsMacros.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 11:14 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 116650: Give unique names to the targets created by KDocToolsMacros.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650/#review52702 --- This review has been submitted with commit 8aad0fb7aaa3bbb9da

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w11

El 11/03/2014 22:58, "Martin Klapetek" escribió: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:19 PM, David Gil Oliva wrote: >>> >>> >>> Announcement: >>> * Beta 1 will be tagged on March 28 instead of April 1st as planned earlier; >> >> >> Why is that? Are we in a hurry? Is the work in all the frameworks so a

Review Request 116747: Clean up KCompletionBox

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116747/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcompletion Description

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w11

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:19 PM, David Gil Oliva wrote: > >> Announcement: >> * Beta 1 will be tagged on March 28 instead of April 1st as planned >> earlier; >> > > Why is that? Are we in a hurry? Is the work in all the frameworks so > advanced that we can advance the tagging? > It's because Da

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w11

Hi! 2014-03-11 16:33 GMT+01:00 Kevin Ottens : > Hello everyone, > > This is the minutes of the Week 10 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > on > #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, dfaure, mgraesslin, notmart, > sebas, teo, tosky and myself. > > Anno

Re: Review Request 116650: Give unique names to the targets created by KDocToolsMacros.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650/#review52690 --- Ship it! Perfect, thanks! - Luigi Toscano On March 11, 201

Re: Review Request 116729: Add a comment explaining the "kde4" in the mime type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116729/#review52673 --- This review has been submitted with commit a148143b772333d71b

Re: Review Request 116729: Add a comment explaining the "kde4" in the mime type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116729/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 7:56 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 116729: Add a comment explaining the "kde4" in the mime type

> On March 11, 2014, 7:21 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote: > > Would it make sense to support both "kde" and "kde4" names (if that's even > > possible)? It should be possible to support them, yes. I would suggest "application/x-kio-urilist", though, since that property is really for KIO URIs. Of

Review Request 116740: Fix kdeglobals location in apidox

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116740/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kxmlgui Description

Review Request 116739: Update commented-out cmake code to new macros

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116739/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: solid Description --

Re: Review Request 116729: Add a comment explaining the "kde4" in the mime type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116729/#review52671 --- Ship it! Would it make sense to support both "kde" and "kde4"

Re: Review Request 116732: Use the new uic macro

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116732/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 5:35 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 116732: Use the new uic macro

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116732/#review52666 --- This review has been submitted with commit 431e9f57932bfb3fc4

Re: Review Request 116732: Use the new uic macro

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116732/#review52663 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On March 11, 2014,

Review Request 116732: Use the new uic macro

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116732/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Valentin Rusu. Repository: kwallet

Review Request 116729: Add a comment explaining the "kde4" in the mime type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116729/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck. Repository: kwidget

Review Request 116728: Remove no-longer-needed magic variable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116728/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kjs Description ---

Review Request 116727: Remove obsolete code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116727/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kinit Description --

Review Request 116726: Remove unused CMakeLists.txt file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116726/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.

Review Request 116725: Remove out-of-date README

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116725/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdesignerplugin Descript

Review Request 116724: Replace comment that refers to removed code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116724/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdeclarative Description

Re: Review Request 116723: Update cmake code in apidox to reflect new macro names

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116723/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 4:22 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 116723: Update cmake code in apidox to reflect new macro names

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116723/#review52656 --- This review has been submitted with commit 3af18449fd880fd9a8

Re: Review Request 116723: Update cmake code in apidox to reflect new macro names

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116723/#review52655 --- This review has been submitted with commit e0f7c5b06da59ceedc

Re: Review Request 116723: Update cmake code in apidox to reflect new macro names

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116723/#review52653 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On March 11, 2014,

Review Request 116723: Update cmake code in apidox to reflect new macro names

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116723/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kauth Description --

KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2014-w11

Hello everyone, This is the minutes of the Week 10 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. Were present: afiestas, agateau, alexmerry, dfaure, mgraesslin, notmart, sebas, teo, tosky and myself. Announcement: * Beta 1 will be tagged on March 28 instead of April

Re: Should we kill the broken "Class Members" links on api.kde.org?

Hello, On Tuesday 11 March 2014 07:24:51 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > All pages on api.kde.org have a sidebar with a few links in there. One > of them is "Class Members". If you look at it, you might be surprised to > learn we only have methods which starts with an 'a' :) > > Example: > http://api.kd

Should we kill the broken "Class Members" links on api.kde.org?

Hi, All pages on api.kde.org have a sidebar with a few links in there. One of them is "Class Members". If you look at it, you might be surprised to learn we only have methods which starts with an 'a' :) Example: http://api.kde.org/frameworks-api/frameworks5-apidocs/kconfig/html/functions.html Th

Re: Review Request 116713: Remove FindOpenEXR.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116713/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 2:01 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 116713: Remove FindOpenEXR.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116713/#review52641 --- This review has been submitted with commit 2ded57d50ec0de3e97

Re: Review Request 116713: Remove FindOpenEXR.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116713/#review52640 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alex Merry On March 11, 2014, 1:55 p.m

Review Request 116713: Remove FindOpenEXR.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116713/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry. Repository: kimageforma

kglobalaccel fixes

A quick heads-up: I'm looking into what's broken in our global shortcuts. Here's a quick run-down of my findings so far: kglobalaccel has some brokenness in it. It used to poke into the privates of KGlobalShortcutInfo in order to create its own object in a cast. This code is disabled right now

Re: Review Request 116653: Create ECMFindModuleHelpers module for common find-module code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116653/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 12:32 p.m.) Review request for Build System, Ext

Re: Review Request 116025: Add documentation about writing find modules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116025/#review52628 --- This review has been submitted with commit bebacbcf8580dd9830

Re: Review Request 116025: Add documentation about writing find modules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116025/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 11:41 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 116650: Give unique names to the targets created by KDocToolsMacros.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116650/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 11:05 a.m.) Review request for Build System and

Re: Review Request 116696: Fix kservice_desktop_to_json when using cmake 2.8

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116696/#review52624 --- This review has been submitted with commit 8be89cb18293fce57b

Re: Review Request 116696: Fix kservice_desktop_to_json when using cmake 2.8

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116696/ --- (Updated March 11, 2014, 10 a.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Documentation policy moved to community.kde.org

Hi, As was discussed a few weeks ago, I moved the Frameworks Documentation Policy from techbase.kde.org to community.kde.org. You can find it here: https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Frameworks_Documentation_Policy It is basically a slightly refreshed version of the KDE4 kdelibs policy, with fr

Re: Review Request 116696: Fix kservice_desktop_to_json when using cmake 2.8

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116696/#review52619 --- Ship it! I can reproduce the failure on ktexteditor with cmak