Re: GSoC: KioFuse

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hello KDE developers! > > I looked at KDE GSoC wiki page [1] and there is for me interesting > project KioFuse. Did I understand it correctly, that KioFuse can be > usefull for non KIO/KDE applications which want to open file from KIO > (e.g net

Re: Review Request 115028: Inline deprecated KUser::fullName() method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115028/#review50554 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Feb. 22, 2014, 5:28 p.m

Re: Review Request 115897: Remove FindDocBook*.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115897/#review50553 --- As this was already committed, can this RR be closed? - Luigi

Re: Review Request 115879: DocBookXML has been renamed, use the new exported variables

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:36 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Ship It! Superceeded by https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115956/ - Luigi --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879/#r

Re: Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against > > the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :) > > Alex Merry wrote: > I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I > did

Re: Review Request 115879: DocBookXML has been renamed, use the new exported variables

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 6:19 p.m.) Status -- This change has been di

Re: Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 6:20 p.m.) Status -- This change has been di

Review Request 115956: More generic (renamed) KDocBookXML4.cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115956/ --- Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctool

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On Saturday 22 of February 2014 17:39:33 Alex Merry wrote: > On 20/02/14 16:00, šumski wrote: > > KItemModels are even more GPL, than LGPLv2+, 'only' > > main.cpp, lessthanwidget.(cpp|h), mainwindow.(cpp|h), > > selectionpmwidget.(cpp|h), descendantpmwidget.(cpp|h), > > recursivefilterpmwidget.(cpp

Re: Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against > > the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :) > > Alex Merry wrote: > I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I > did

Re: Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against > > the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :) > > Alex Merry wrote: > I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I > did

Re: Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against > > the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :) > > Alex Merry wrote: > I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I > did

Review Request 115953: Clean up kdesu CMake files

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115953/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdesu Description --

Re: Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against > > the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :) I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I did it on another RR?) I would r

Re: KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

On 20/02/14 16:00, šumski wrote: > On Thursday 20 of February 2014 11:41:48 Alex Merry wrote: > ... >> KItemModels >> >> kcheckableproxymodel.(cpp|h) is Stephen Kelly (and, for safety, David >> Faure). >> >> modeltest.(cpp|h) were taken from Qt Concurrent, and subsequently >> modified by Stephen Ke

Re: Review Request 115028: Inline deprecated KUser::fullName() method

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115028/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 5:28 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. C

DocBookXML 4.5, the plan

Hi all, these are the steps of plan for bumping the default DocBook XML version to 4.5 while keeping the compatibility on the old 4.2-based when kde4support is used: 1) commit rename/changes of FindDocBookXML (RR 115876 and 115879); 2) kde4support: copy files FindDocBookXML, catalog.xml, kdex.dtd

Re: Review Request 115909: Remove unused dependency from krunner

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115909/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 3:42 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115909: Remove unused dependency from krunner

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115909/#review50537 --- This review has been submitted with commit b2507733f491e9ad29

Re: configuration file found with version 4.96.0 but version 5.2 is required by the KF5 buld

On 21/02/14 16:01, Shivam Makkar wrote: > Hi ! > > I was trying to build Kde-Framework 5 and got following CMake error > while executing ./kdesrc-build. > > the error produces every time, for Kde-workspace and kde-rumtime, > regarding config file found but with older version. > > /CMake Error a

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/#review50535 --- If this is tier 1 now, please don't forget to update the wiki

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

> On Feb. 22, 2014, 1:35 p.m., Chusslove Illich wrote: > > I tried to run a standalone non-GUI program using ki18n: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main (int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); > > KLocalizedString::setApplicationDomain("test-ki

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 2:15 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/#review50532 --- This review has been submitted with commit 6d405c31ac624b4ea8

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/#review50531 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chusslove Illich On Feb. 22, 2014, 3 p

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

> On Feb. 22, 2014, 2:35 p.m., Chusslove Illich wrote: > > I tried to run a standalone non-GUI program using ki18n: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main (int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); > > KLocalizedString::setApplicationDomain("test-ki

Re: Frameworks sprint in Barcelona

On Saturday 22 February 2014 14:44:06 Mark Gaiser wrote: > April 24th is final for the Frameworks sprint. Or is it still possible > to change it to April 3-6? It's final, you wouldn't get me after all on the 3rd, and it's likely pointless to have it without Aurélien. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, h

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 2 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Chu

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

> On Feb. 22, 2014, 2:35 p.m., Chusslove Illich wrote: > > I tried to run a standalone non-GUI program using ki18n: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main (int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); > > KLocalizedString::setApplicationDomain("test-ki

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 1:58 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

> On Feb. 22, 2014, 1:35 p.m., Chusslove Illich wrote: > > I tried to run a standalone non-GUI program using ki18n: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main (int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); > > KLocalizedString::setApplicationDomain("test-ki

Re: Review Request 115936: Split ki18n ktranscript tests into one using the plugin and one instantiating/destroying the class directly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115936/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 1:48 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115936: Split ki18n ktranscript tests into one using the plugin and one instantiating/destroying the class directly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115936/#review50525 --- This review has been submitted with commit a51fb0f278f0d58378

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

> On Feb. 22, 2014, 1:35 p.m., Chusslove Illich wrote: > > I tried to run a standalone non-GUI program using ki18n: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main (int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); > > KLocalizedString::setApplicationDomain("test-ki

Re: Review Request 115936: Split ki18n ktranscript tests into one using the plugin and one instantiating/destroying the class directly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115936/#review50523 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chusslove Illich On Feb. 22, 2014, 2:4

Re: Frameworks sprint in Barcelona

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:28 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:58:09 Mark Gaiser wrote: >> I only filled in April 3rd since that makes worth to stay in barcelona >> after the pim sprint. > > Strange way of using doodle. Red is supposed to mean "impossible", not > "slightly

Re: Review Request 115936: Split ki18n ktranscript tests into one using the plugin and one instantiating/destroying the class directly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115936/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 1:42 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 115485: Porting KTranscript from KJS to QtScript

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115485/#review50522 --- I tried to run a standalone non-GUI program using ki18n: #i

Re: Review Request 115936: Split ki18n ktranscript tests into one using the plugin and one instantiating/destroying the class directly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115936/#review50521 --- In fact, in real use the plugin is never unloaded. So I think

Re: configuration file found with version 4.96.0 but version 5.2 is required by the KF5 buld

On 22/02/14 11:26, Alex Merry wrote: > On 21/02/14 16:01, Shivam Makkar wrote: >> /CMake Error at >> /home/amourphious/kf5/inst/share/cmake-3.0/Modules/CMakeFindDependencyMacro.cmake:52 >> (find_package):/ >> / Could not find a configuration file for package "KF5Pty" that is >> compatible/ >> / w

Re: Review Request 115742: KParts: Allow compilation on windows

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115742/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 12:04 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 115742: KParts: Allow compilation on windows

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115742/#review50520 --- This review has been submitted with commit bafe8c28c3d1321478

Re: Review Request 115395: Also pass -fno-exceptions when building with clang

> On Feb. 3, 2014, 7:07 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > Please see the big comment below the elseif line, the link to the > > kde-core-devel and > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=138244424421211&w=2: the issue > > here is that if you pass -fno-exceptions to clang you need to

Re: Review Request 115744: Fix projects using KDocTools on windows.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115744/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, noon) Status -- This change has been marked

Re: Review Request 115744: Fix projects using KDocTools on windows.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115744/#review50518 --- This review has been submitted with commit d30e407506261831dc

Re: configuration file found with version 4.96.0 but version 5.2 is required by the KF5 buld

On 21/02/14 16:01, Shivam Makkar wrote: > /CMake Error at > /home/amourphious/kf5/inst/share/cmake-3.0/Modules/CMakeFindDependencyMacro.cmake:52 > (find_package):/ > / Could not find a configuration file for package "KF5Pty" that is > compatible/ > / with requested version "5.2"./ Huh. I have n

Re: WebP image plugin

On 22/02/14 09:11, David Faure wrote: > On Friday 21 February 2014 16:33:29 Hrvoje Senjan wrote: >>> On Feb. 20, 2014, 12:56 p.m., Commit Hook wrote: This review has been submitted with commit 4fbbc75429597dc545ae8af24e870d9bac5f2f2a by Alex Merry to branch master. >> >> Seems Qt 5.3

configuration file found with version 4.96.0 but version 5.2 is required by the KF5 buld

Hi ! I was trying to build Kde-Framework 5 and got following CMake error while executing ./kdesrc-build. the error produces every time, for Kde-workspace and kde-rumtime, regarding config file found but with older version. *CMake Error at /home/amourphious/kf5/inst/share/cmake-3.0/Modules/CMakeF

Re: Frameworks sprint in Barcelona

On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:58:09 Mark Gaiser wrote: > I only filled in April 3rd since that makes worth to stay in barcelona > after the pim sprint. Strange way of using doodle. Red is supposed to mean "impossible", not "slightly less convenient". Because the way you filled it in, it reads l

WebP image plugin

On Friday 21 February 2014 16:33:29 Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > On Feb. 20, 2014, 12:56 p.m., Commit Hook wrote: > > > This review has been submitted with commit > > > 4fbbc75429597dc545ae8af24e870d9bac5f2f2a by Alex Merry to branch > > > master. > > Seems Qt 5.3 will have it's own webp plugin (commit

Re: Review Request 115207: Improve integration QCommandLineParser <-> KAboutData

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115207/#review50501 --- src/lib/kaboutdata.cpp

Re: Review Request 115028: Inline deprecated KUser::fullName() method

> On Feb. 20, 2014, 12:16 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > src/lib/CMakeLists.txt, line 86 > > > > > > Not sure about that... I don't think we want the library itself to use > > deprecated methods. So knowing about