Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

Hwllo, On Monday 11 November 2013 15:43:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > I see, and agree. So the way forward with kspeech would be to make it > it's own framework. then at some point turn the header/dbus interface > into a library that can hide the implementation details of using the > dbus interface d

Jenkins build is back to normal : plasma-framework_master_qt5 #898

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-framework_master_qt5 #897

See Changes: [sebas] Navigation improvements [sebas] correct initial date setting, theming improvement -- Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely

Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

> On Nov. 12, 2013, 12:02 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > Maybe I've missed something, but I would like to have it explained somehow. > > Why is it bad to define such values? How will g++ calls compare? > > Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > In normal CMake, -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug builds withou

Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

> On Nov. 11, 2013, 9:02 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > Maybe I've missed something, but I would like to have it explained somehow. > > Why is it bad to define such values? How will g++ calls compare? In normal CMake, -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug builds without optimization and with debugging

Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113805/#review43480 --- Maybe I've missed something, but I would like to have it explai

Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113805/#review43479 --- Ship it! Yes please. - Nicolás Alvarez On Nov. 11, 2013, 7:

Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

I see, and agree. So the way forward with kspeech would be to make it it's own framework. then at some point turn the header/dbus interface into a library that can hide the implementation details of using the dbus interface directly, right? Something like libkspeech.so that has a class/namespace to

Re: Review Request 113696: Rename knewstuff private headers to _p.h

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113696/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 10:39 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 113696: Rename knewstuff private headers to _p.h

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113696/#review43476 --- This review has been submitted with commit d1059d857475e50a7e3

Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113805/ --- Review request for Build System and KDE Frameworks. Repository: extra-cmak

Re: Review Request 113801: note that binaries are for developer use

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113801/#review43464 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Richard Moore On Nov. 11, 2013, 6:14 p.

Re: Review Request 112785: Add ki18n_wrap_ui macro to ki18nMacros

Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any chance to see an update or it is abandonned? > Regarding what I wrote before, CMake is now (in master) able to extract the uic options from the KF5::KI18n target. The uic executable in Qt 5.3 accepts an -include argument https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,70

Jenkins build is back to normal : kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1644

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Review Request 113795: Cut dependency from KIO to KCoreAddons private headers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113795/#review43456 --- This review has been submitted with commit 473faedc80a23a0164c

Re: Review Request 113795: Cut dependency from KIO to KCoreAddons private headers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113795/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 6:46 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1643

See Changes: [aleixpol] Let kio be included without a prefix -- [...truncated 6840 lines...] [ 83%] Building CXX object tier4/khtml/src/CMakeFiles/KHtml.dir/misc/kencodingdetector.cpp.o [ 83%]

Re: Review Request 113798: KDBusService: pass the desktop startup ID when calling Activate

> On Nov. 11, 2013, 5:45 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > Thanks for implementing that. Indeed the TODO didn't mean adding a method > > to QApplication, but it was about the member that was there in qt4, and > > that is now in QXcbConnection. > > > > The optional dependency on QtGui breaks the rul

Review Request 113801: note that binaries are for developer use

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113801/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Richard Moore. Repository: kdelibs

Re: Review Request 113796: KDBusService: only register desktop activation object for Unique apps

> On Nov. 11, 2013, 5:28 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > I'm not sure this is a good idea. > > > > Yes, the spec for this (e.g. for app launchers) is only about unique apps, > > but I still want to be able to start a konqueror instance > > (org.kde.konqueror-12345) and then make a dbus call to ha

Re: Review Request 113795: Cut dependency from KIO to KCoreAddons private headers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113795/#review43450 --- Ship it! Assuming tests pass :) - David Faure On Nov. 11, 2

Re: Review Request 113798: KDBusService: pass the desktop startup ID when calling Activate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113798/#review43449 --- Thanks for implementing that. Indeed the TODO didn't mean addin

Jenkins build is back to normal : plasma-framework_master_qt5 #894

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-framework_master_qt5 #893

See Changes: [aleixpol] Don't use KDE/ includes, they're deprecated [aleixpol] Make sure that plasma-framework is not using anything from kdelibs4 [aleixpol] Only include QCA includes where needed --

Re: Review Request 113796: KDBusService: only register desktop activation object for Unique apps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113796/#review43446 --- I'm not sure this is a good idea. Yes, the spec for this (e.g.

Re: kdelibs failure in cmake?

On Monday 11 November 2013 15:23:02 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > Hello, > > in two machines with no source, build and install dir > kdelibs fails in cmake with this error > > CMake Error at staging/kio/src/kpac/CMakeLists.txt:19 (find_package): > By not providing "FindKF5.cmake" in CMAKE_MODUL

Re: konsole build broken

On Monday 11 November 2013 12:47:47 Harald Sitter wrote: > Would be great if someone could look at it. > > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/156314974/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.project-> > neon5-konsole_0.0%2Bgit2013%2Br5106~ffbca60%2Bneon6~ubuntu13.10.1_FAILED > TOBUILD.txt.gz http://build.kde

Review Request 113798: KDBusService: pass the desktop startup ID when calling Activate

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113798/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Kevin Ottens. Repositor

Review Request 113796: KDBusService: only register desktop activation object for Unique apps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113796/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Kevin Ottens. Repositor

Jenkins build is back to normal : kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1641

See ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Review Request 112874: Allow disabling of QCA plugins during build.

> On Oct. 13, 2013, 11:03 p.m., Ivan Romanov wrote: > > Two issues. > > > > 1. all means all possible not all of them. If I haven't nss on my system > > qca-nss plugin won't built but all others will be built. > > 2. In INSTALL instructions. > > > > BUILD_PLUGINS - define which plugins shou

Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1640

See Changes: [de.meyer.maarten] Fix kcmutils standalone build -- [...truncated 6843 lines...] :2066:11: warnin

Re: Review Request 113708: Make kcmutils build standalone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113708/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 2:51 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113708: Make kcmutils build standalone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113708/#review43439 --- This review has been submitted with commit e02250277de83c90628

Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1639

See Changes: [aleixpol] Fix KParts standalone build [aleixpol] Fix KDEWebKit standalone build [aleixpol] Fix KNotifyConfig standalone build [aleixpol] Fix KNewStuff standalone build -- [...t

Re: Review Request 113693: Fix KNotifyConfig standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113693/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 2:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113686: Fix KParts standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113686/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 2:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113693: Fix KNotifyConfig standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113693/#review43436 --- This review has been submitted with commit 25e6882a52b9e564a07

Re: Review Request 113694: Fix KNewStuff standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113694/#review43437 --- This review has been submitted with commit c3bdecbd045b720f5b3

Re: Review Request 113694: Fix KNewStuff standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113694/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 2:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113686: Fix KParts standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113686/#review43434 --- This review has been submitted with commit d691d3fac78fcebdcb9

Re: Review Request 113695: Fix KDEWebKit standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113695/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 2:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113695: Fix KDEWebKit standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113695/#review43435 --- This review has been submitted with commit 08a55302afa6d19f879

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113723/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 2:15 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113723/#review43433 --- This review has been submitted with commit 910459f0fd63c1336a0

kdelibs failure in cmake?

Hello, in two machines with no source, build and install dir kdelibs fails in cmake with this error CMake Error at staging/kio/src/kpac/CMakeLists.txt:19 (find_package): By not providing "FindKF5.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project has asked CMake to find a package configuration file pro

Review Request 113795: Cut dependency from KIO to KCoreAddons private headers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113795/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. Repository: kdelibs D

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113723/#review43421 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Nov. 11, 2013, 11:40 a.m

KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w46 Reminder

Hello all, Just a quick reminder: The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen on #kde-devel tomorrow at 4pm Paris time. See you there! Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

konsole build broken

Would be great if someone could look at it. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/156314974/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.project-neon5-konsole_0.0%2Bgit2013%2Br5106~ffbca60%2Bneon6~ubuntu13.10.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz http://build.kde.org/job/konsole_frameworks_qt5/33/console Generating moc_Part.cpp /bu

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113723/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 11:40 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. C

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

> On Nov. 11, 2013, 9:54 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/jobs/kcompositejob_p.h, line 30 > > > > > > Err why did you remove the inheritance from KJobPrivate, which is > > in the same lib

Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

On Monday 11 November 2013 11:13:37 David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 15:28:27 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 11:15:58 Dominik Haumann wrote: > > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:47:41 David Faure wrote: > > > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 04:32:12 Friedrich W. H. Ko

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday, November 3, 2013 20:51:57 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > I wanted to release ECM as fast as possible, since this was one of the main > points I got from the platform meeting in Randa in June 2011: people want to > be able to use cmake stuff from KDE without depending on kdelibs. > Stephen a

Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

On Sunday 10 November 2013 15:28:27 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 11:15:58 Dominik Haumann wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:47:41 David Faure wrote: > > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 04:32:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > > So from my point of view, especially give

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:48 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 11 November 2013 01:06:33 Michael Pyne wrote: > > On Sun, November 10, 2013 20:11:07 David Faure wrote: > > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 13:44:09 Michael Pyne wrote: > > > > I would highly recommend doing something similar to what w

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113723/#review43411 --- I don't get the "dependency of a dependency" thing, surely once

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

> On Nov. 9, 2013, 12:47 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/CMakeLists.txt, line 128 > > > > > > I think we should instead treat them as separate libs, and remove the > > inheritance from KCom

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Monday 11 November 2013 01:06:33 Michael Pyne wrote: > On Sun, November 10, 2013 20:11:07 David Faure wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 13:44:09 Michael Pyne wrote: > > > I would highly recommend doing something similar to what was done for > > > strigi when it was split into 5 git modules.

Re: Review Request 113685: New KColorSchemeManager to support changing color scheme in app

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/#review43408 --- For me, it looks like it has the functionality I'd need for Kri