KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w43 Reminder

Hello all, I forgot to send it yesterday, so just a quick reminder: The next KF5 Update Meeting will happen *today* at *4pm* Paris time. See you there! Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net Sponsored by KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.

Re: Projects adding dependencies without clear indication of requirements

The dependency is kactivities/frameworks branch which does not depend on nepomuk-core nor soprano. Deps for kactivities are: -- The following OPTIONAL packages have been found: * KDBusAddons * KWindowSystem * KCoreAddons * KConfig -- The following REQUIRED packages have been found: * ECM

Projects adding dependencies without clear indication of requirements

Hi all, It seems that plasma-framework (a dependency of kde-workspace master) has now added a dependency on kactivities. However kactivities itself depends on nepomuk-core and soprano - and there is no frameworks / Qt 5 branch for either of those. How do we proceed here? I'd appreciate it if mor

Re: Review Request 112984: Adjust API in KEmoticons framework: KEmoticonsProvider::save()

> On Oct. 11, 2013, 4:28 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Ship It! > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any reason why this patch isn't pushed yet? Yes. There are some personal reasons and, besides, I've been trying for days to compile Qt5.2 with no luck till today. I think I'll have both patches pushed

Re: Review Request 113376: KDirWatch: don't check for symlinks on Windows.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113376/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 8:46 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Re

Review Request 113376: KDirWatch: don't check for symlinks on Windows.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113376/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdelibs Description -

Review Request 113378: Trivial warning fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113378/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdelibs Description -

Re: Review Request 113377: Add KDeclarative to known KF5 tier3 modules

2013/10/21 Sebastian Kügler > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113377/ > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly. > By Sebastian Kügler. > Repository: extra-cmake-modules > > Description > > Add KDeclarative to known KF

Review Request 113377: Add KDeclarative to known KF5 tier3 modules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113377/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly. Repository: extra-cma

Re: Review Request 113297: Remove 'override' from ThreadWeaver::IdDecorator destructor.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113297/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 11:02 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 113297: Remove 'override' from ThreadWeaver::IdDecorator destructor.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113297/#review42139 --- This review has been submitted with commit f86c5a9f96b571c15f1

Re: Review Request 113299: KDirWatch code style: braces for one-liner conditionals

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113299/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 7:31 p.m.) Status -- This change has been dis

Re: Review Request 113298: KDirWatch code style: cleanup whitespace.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113298/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 10:30 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 113298: KDirWatch code style: cleanup whitespace.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113298/#review42138 --- This review has been submitted with commit 11ee78a9c8139f236f3

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-framework_master_qt5 #827

See Changes: [aleixpol] Stop using Qt5Transitional in Plasma Frameworks -- Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-framework_master_qt5 #826

See Changes: [notmart] use the ctivity class and Kactivities [notmart] make activity switching work [notmart] link to KF5::KActivities [notmart] activity switching animation [notmart] a toggleActivityManager action --

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-framework_master_qt5 #825

See Changes: [notmart] get rid of WidgetExplorerView -- [...truncated 326 lines...] Generating moc_storagetest.cpp Generating mouseeventlistener.moc

Re: Review Request 113373: Enable C++11 support by default.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/#review42130 --- As far as I know, only threadweaver and karchive will be releas

Re: Review Request 113373: Enable C++11 support by default.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 7:18 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: > > As the next CMake release will have a better solution which works for all > > compilers: > > > > set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11) > > > > I'm not in favor of adding and having to support this flag. > > > > I don't consider it my decision thou

Re: Review Request 113373: Enable C++11 support by default.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/#review42126 --- As the next CMake release will have a better solution which wor

Review Request 113373: Enable C++11 support by default.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/ --- Review request for Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly.

Re: Config files naming policy

> do you mean the Config.cmake files or application configuration files ? The application configuration files. Ivan -- When the pupil is ready to learn, a teacher will appear. -- Basho ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.

Re: [kdelibs/frameworks] staging/kio/src/core: Add include/KDE to users of KIOCore.

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Git commit 5e9404239fb974973e8a253444131884954ede77 by Stephen Kelly. > Committed on 21/10/2013 at 12:49. > Pushed by skelly into branch 'frameworks'. > > Add include/KDE to users of KIOCore. > > Note that this really only hides the problem.

Re: Review Request 113258: Fix compilation with C++11 enabled.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/#review42122 --- This review has been submitted with commit a959675fb3ca4d936cd

Re: Review Request 113258: Fix compilation with C++11 enabled.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 6:25 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Config files naming policy

On Monday 21 October 2013, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > Since we are now sharing the locations of our configs with non-kde > software, we can potentially get collisions with those. > > I'm proposing changing the names of the config files to org.kde.something > (or some other alternative). do

Re: Review Request 113365: Fix #include

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113365/#review42119 --- Ship it! Looks sane, and builds fine even when I remove the in

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

> Well, to be honest, if you don't want a 4.13 release i'd prefer you actually > use master for KF5. Otherwise people might random-commit fixes to master > and then wonder why they never got into a release, so the two situations i > think make sense are: People don't really contribute to kactivit

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

El Dilluns, 21 d'octubre de 2013, a les 18:43:20, Ivan Čukić va escriure: > > I was planning to branch master into KDE/4.12 after October 30 and > > before November 6. > > Forget about it. Decided not to create problems - I'll use the same name > for the branch as kdelibs do for the time being - f

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

> I was planning to branch master into KDE/4.12 after October 30 and > before November 6. > Forget about it. Decided not to create problems - I'll use the same name for the branch as kdelibs do for the time being - frameworks :) Also it means that you don't want a 4.13.x for kactivities, right? >

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

El Dilluns, 21 d'octubre de 2013, a les 14:02:42, Ivan Čukić va escriure: > > Please no. We have a 4.12 release to make in 2 weeks and back when we did > > the 4.12 planning the only agreed repo to be freezed for 4.11 was > > kde-workspace. > > What about doing an early KDE/4.12 branch from master

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

> Hi all, > > Following kde-workspace (and stealing a few sentences from that > announcement), > we're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kactivities into > master later today. That means if you're building 4.x branch of Plasma > yourself from Git, you should switch to the > KD

Re: cyclic dependency kinit - kservice

On Monday 21 October 2013 17:01:44 Treeve Jelbert wrote: > kinit needs kservice and installs KInitMacros.cmake which defines > kf5_add_kdeinit_executable which is needed by kservice/kbuildsycoca Well, spotted, missed that one in the review. Alex could you look into solving this cycle? Thanks in a

Review Request 113371: Kross: Remove the KJs backened

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113371/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdelibs Description -

Review Request 113370: move KDED to Tier3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113370/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdelibs Description -

Re: Review Request 108845: add support for SSSE3 and SSE4.2 in cpufeatures and for msvc

> On Sept. 23, 2013, 9:12 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any reason why this patch isn't committed yet? Please do so ASAP. > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any news? > > I'll close it as discarded if I don't see any activity by next monday. I've integrated it, you don't have to worry about

Re: Review Request 108845: add support for SSSE3 and SSE4.2 in cpufeatures and for msvc

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/#review42107 --- This review has been submitted with commit 88bf26e1bc2bb3ac8a3

Re: Review Request 108845: add support for SSSE3 and SSE4.2 in cpufeatures and for msvc

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 3:23 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

cyclic dependency kinit - kservice

kinit needs kservice and installs KInitMacros.cmake which defines kf5_add_kdeinit_executable which is needed by kservice/kbuildsycoca ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-

Re: Fwd: Failing Tests in Kross

Aloha Sebastian :D On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > > Aloha Vishesh :) > > Unfortunately I don't have a working kf5 setup, there are no packages for my > distribution and keeping up with kf5 development is near impossible for me > having a fulltime-job and family. > That

Re: Fwd: Failing Tests in Kross

Hey everyone I managed to contact Sebastian through his kdab email account. I've attached the response below. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 10/16/2013 03:15 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> >> Hey Sebastian > > > Aloha Vishesh :) > > >> If you get some free time could y

Re: Review Request 112755: Reimplement KXUtils::createPixmapFromHandle with XCB

> On Oct. 9, 2013, 6:39 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any news about that patch? It hasn't seen activity lately. > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Anybody home? > > FYI I'll close it as discarded if it doesn't have any activity by next > monday. hey, I'm going to pick it up again! Just ha

Re: Review Request 113148: Move and clean KBuildsycoca to KService

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 2:09 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113148: Move and clean KBuildsycoca to KService

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/#review42095 --- This review has been submitted with commit 4c47af4414c11a8fb0d

Re: Review Request 113328: Fix standalone build of kdoctools

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 1:43 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > tier2/kdoctools/CMakeLists.txt, line 18 > > > > > > FOOBAR really? :-) > > > > In fact ecm_setup_version might not even be needed for that one, it has

Re: Review Request 113328: Fix standalone build of kdoctools

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113328/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 3:32 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Ch

[kdelibs/frameworks] staging/kio/src/core: Add include/KDE to users of KIOCore.

Git commit 5e9404239fb974973e8a253444131884954ede77 by Stephen Kelly. Committed on 21/10/2013 at 12:49. Pushed by skelly into branch 'frameworks'. Add include/KDE to users of KIOCore. Note that this really only hides the problem. There are several problems with the KF5 includes, and several patch

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113302/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 12:40 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Review Request 113365: Fix #include

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113365/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Klapetek. Repository: kdelibs

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

> On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote: > > Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible > > corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need > > to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern > > distros I thin

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 12:05 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I think it's OK to keep it based only on statics. As such we can go for it. OK, let's go for static methods only then. - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113302/#review42085 --- Ship it! I think it's OK to keep it based only on statics. As

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

> On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it > > static-methods-only. > > It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra > > flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use > > it no

Re: kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

> Please no. We have a 4.12 release to make in 2 weeks and back when we did > the 4.12 planning the only agreed repo to be freezed for 4.11 was > kde-workspace. What about doing an early KDE/4.12 branch from master so that the release can continue as planned, while not slowing us down for further

Re: Review Request 113148: Move and clean KBuildsycoca to KService

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/#review42083 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 21, 2013, 10:22 a.

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

> On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it > > static-methods-only. > > It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra > > flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use > > it no

Re: Review Request 113328: Fix standalone build of kdoctools

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113328/#review42080 --- tier2/kdoctools/CMakeLists.txt

Re: Review Request 113258: Fix compilation with C++11 enabled.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/#review42081 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 15, 2013, 6:43 p.m

Re: Review Request 113329: Adapt KSystemTimeZones to new KTimeZoned signal

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113329/#review42079 --- Ship it! Preemptively giving this one a ship it. Can go in onc

Re: Review Request 113298: KDirWatch code style: cleanup whitespace.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113298/#review42078 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 17, 2013, 7:53 p.m

Re: Review Request 113299: KDirWatch code style: braces for one-liner conditionals

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113299/#review42077 --- I would leave them alone for now. I think we'll revisit the top

Re: Review Request 113181: Add KDebug porting notes to KDE5PORTING.html

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113181/#review42075 --- This review has been submitted with commit 858f8cc8702663811ef

Re: Review Request 113181: Add KDebug porting notes to KDE5PORTING.html

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113181/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 11:30 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 113297: Remove 'override' from ThreadWeaver::IdDecorator destructor.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113297/#review42076 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 17, 2013, 12:08 a.

Re: Review Request 113266: introduce KMessageBoxNotifyInterface to support notifications

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113266/#review42074 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Oct. 16, 2013, 1:35 p.m

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

> On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it > > static-methods-only. > > It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra > > flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use > > it no

Re: Review Request 112985: Adjust API in KEmoticons framework: map and index methods

> On Oct. 11, 2013, 4:28 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Ship It! Any reason why this patch is not pushed yet? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112985/#review41567 --

Re: Review Request 112984: Adjust API in KEmoticons framework: KEmoticonsProvider::save()

> On Oct. 11, 2013, 4:28 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Ship It! Any reason why this patch isn't pushed yet? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112984/#review41566 ---

Re: Review Request 113155: Port all kde4_add_unit_test uses

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113155/#review42070 --- Any chance to see Alexander comments addressed? - Kevin Ottens

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112880/#review42069 --- To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the fram

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

> On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote: > > Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible > > corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need > > to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern > > distros I thin

Re: Review Request 112443: Native event filter porting for KModifierKeyInfoProvider

> On Sept. 23, 2013, 10:07 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Tested the patch in my tree, works for caps lock too. > > > > Now it highlights a dependency problem... We don't want a dependency on > > QX11Extras from KGuiAddons. So maybe we should move KModifierKeyInfo to > > your proposed KX11Extra

Re: Review Request 112896: Rework NETWM classes

> On Sept. 26, 2013, 2:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote: > > I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've > > discussed it many times; > > that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch. > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > my aim was to write the unit te

Re: Review Request 112755: Reimplement KXUtils::createPixmapFromHandle with XCB

> On Oct. 9, 2013, 4:39 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any news about that patch? It hasn't seen activity lately. Anybody home? FYI I'll close it as discarded if it doesn't have any activity by next monday. - Kevin --- This is an automa

kactivities master becomes Qt5/KF5-based

Hi all, Following kde-workspace (and stealing a few sentences from that announcement), we're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kactivities into master later today. That means if you're building 4.x branch of Plasma yourself from Git, you should switch to the KDE/4.11 branch. Th

Re: Review Request 112367: Include the icon's theme in the cache key

> On Aug. 31, 2013, 7:11 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > I disagree. Making things slow to cover a really really corner case (mixing > > kde4 and kde5), while the solution already exists (clearing the cache when > > switching icon themes), doesn't seem very sensible to me. > > > > The point is re

Re: Review Request 108845: add support for SSSE3 and SSE4.2 in cpufeatures and for msvc

> On Sept. 23, 2013, 9:12 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any reason why this patch isn't committed yet? Please do so ASAP. Any news? I'll close it as discarded if I don't see any activity by next monday. - Kevin --- This is an automatic

Re: Review Request 112032: Convert tier1/kwidgetaddons to the new Qt5 signal/slot syntax

> On Sept. 23, 2013, 9:10 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Any news about that patch? Hasn't seen activity in a while, it probably > > doesn't apply cleanly anymore. Still no news? If I don't see activity by next monday I'll close it as discarded. - Kevin -

Re: Review Request 113302: Static KEncodingFileDialog in staging/kio

> On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it > > static-methods-only. > > It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra > > flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use > > it no

Re: Review Request 113148: Move and clean KBuildsycoca to KService

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/ --- (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 10:22 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. C

Config files naming policy

Hi all, Since we are now sharing the locations of our configs with non-kde software, we can potentially get collisions with those. I'm proposing changing the names of the config files to org.kde.something (or some other alternative). Cheerio, Ivan -- Acting is merely the art of keeping a lar

Re: Forward includes

Hello, On Friday 18 October 2013 20:24:00 Aleix Pol wrote: > I realized recently that we have a weird setup for those CamelCased > includes that now we keep in kdelibs/includes, so I was guessing that > probably we want to split them and move them into each directory. I think we want those instal

Re: Can someone verify this? Massive folders only show about 1000 entries in KF/Qt 5.2.

Mark wrote: > Step 2: Create a Qt 5.2 project. CMake or QMake, doesn't matter. it > needs kdelibs, kio and qt widgets and whatever the extra dependencies > are at this moment. You can use this cmake file for reference > http://pastebin.kde.org/ptq5kgkqx. Change the absolute paths. The code > for y

Re: CMake, KF5_INCLUDE_DIRS empty?

Mark wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, David Faure wrote: >> On Sunday 13 October 2013 17:18:28 Mark wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I used to rely on KF5_INCLUDE_DIRS but since a few days that variable >>> seems to be empty. Did i do something wrong? >>> >>> My CMake file for the relevant parts:

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

> On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote: > > Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible > > corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need > > to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern > > distros I thin

Re: Review Request 113258: Fix compilation with C++11 enabled.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/#review42055 --- Ship it! Tricky, one would never have guessed that. I'll adju