onsdagen den 31 oktober 2012 22:03:08 skrev Stephen Kelly:
> My strategy so far has been 'Don't bother doing the Qt 5 porting (to
> kdesupport). Let the maintainers decide when they care about Qt 5'.
>
> It's really just more for the same people (that is, the people working on
> KDE Frameworks) t
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 4:58 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > The circular dependency (due to libinqt5 being in kdelibs currently) will
> > make building a bit harder though. Shouldn't ECM be fixed NOT to require
> > libinqt5?
>
> Jon Severinsson wrote:
> There is no circular dependency, as libinq
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106974/
---
(Updated Nov. 1, 2012, 1:48 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ph