Re: ECMQtFramework.cmake, version header and ECMWriteVersionHeader.cmake

2012-08-14 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 14 August 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... > > So, objections to using ECMWriteVersionHeader.cmake everywhere ? > > No objection from me. > > > Also, the generated version headers in kdelibs are only installed in a > > few places, most remain uninstalled. Is t

Simple script to patch kdelibs frameworks CMakeLists.txt

2012-08-14 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, attached is a simple ruby script to update some (currently two) settings in the CMakeLists.txt of the kdelibs frameworks branch. It currently has two options: patchkf5cmake --ecm-version 0.0.5 : set the required e-c-m version patchkf5cmake --cmake-version 2.8.9 : set the required CMake vers

Please update extra-cmake-modules when updating kdelibs

2012-08-14 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, kdelibs frameworks now requires extra-cmake-modules 0.0.5, so please update this first. Let me know if there are any issues. Alex ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-framework

Please update to cmake 2.8.9

2012-08-14 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, we increased the required version of CMake for KDE frameworks, version 2.8.9 is required now. If you don't have it already, the easiest way to get it is to download the binary package from here http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html ( wget http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.

Re: ECMQtFramework.cmake, version header and ECMWriteVersionHeader.cmake

2012-08-14 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: > and I'm also not sure we should use the term "Framework" here, since this > may very well be mixed up with OSX frameworks by cmake users). OSX users might get themselves confused about the meaning and ownership of the word 'framework', but I don't think that should be

Re: Improved export-sets in CMake

2012-08-14 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> > Do you have time to finish this feature? > > Ok, cmake 2.8.9 has been released. > > How does actually the interface for this proposed extension look like ? I wonder too. Yury do you still have interest and time to w