Hi,
I just want to give some rough notes on a couple of the sessions I
attended at QtCS and my impressions on some of the discussions. See
the Qt development mailing list for more detailed minutes from most
sessions.
Locale:
---
Minutes posted to list.
* ICU will become the Locale backend in
On Monday 09 July 2012 18:05:07 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> Ok, if KDE devs can live without tis signal, i can live too. However we
> could just rename it to something less specific than 'newTabrequested" but
> not confusing with doublClicked().
And we can also add an if() in the apps when porting th
Ok, that's very interesting, but i asked two questions and still don't see any
answer. No offence, Kevin, i just prefer discuss code, not my communication
skiils.
09.07.2012, в 18:34, Kevin Ottens написал(а):
On Monday 09 July 2012 15:46:25 David Faure wrote:
> PS: calling people stupid won't g
On Monday 09 July 2012 15:46:25 David Faure wrote:
> PS: calling people stupid won't get you far in terms of respect within the
> Qt community.
Or the KDE community for that matter: http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud patron of KDE,
Hm, previos message was rejected as spam:)
Ok, if KDE devs can live without tis signal, i can live too. However we
could just rename it to something less specific than 'newTabrequested" but
not confusing with doublClicked().
So, before i start other work with tabbar i would like to ask some
quest
On Monday 09 July 2012 17:26:46 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> I answered to them. They disagree with them in that case. For me is biggest
> priority is to port as much kde as code as possible. And i didn't even try
> to port d'n'd related signals for same reasons as Jeremy says - API should
> be minimal
I answered to them. They disagree with them in that case. For me is biggest
priority is to port as much kde as code as possible. And i didn't even try
to port d'n'd related signals for same reasons as Jeremy says - API should
be minimal.
2012/7/9 Frank Reininghaus
> Hi,
>
> 2012/7/9 Иван Комисса
Hi,
2012/7/9 Иван Комиссаров:
> Hm, it seems that Qt guys are not very happy seeing KDE features in qt.
> I would like someone from KDE to participate in discussions about changes.
> For example, they insist that KTabBar functionality is not needed "as it can
> be easily implemented in subclass":)
Hm, it seems that Qt guys are not very happy seeing KDE features in qt.
I would like someone from KDE to participate in discussions about changes.
For example, they insist that KTabBar functionality is not needed "as it
can be easily implemented in subclass":)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#cha
Benjamin Port wrote:
> Currently when we build kdelibs there are lots of warnings. That's why I
> suggest to add a remove all warnings in the definition of done.
>
> But we can't remove all warnings, indeed some warnings come from moc file
> (deprecated slots) and from unit test where we want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
