On Sunday 01 July 2012 16:24:51 Mark wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 July 2012 14:07:15 Mark wrote:
> >> On a related note for KCompletion vs QCompleter.
> >> I don't think the two should merge.
> >
> > I agree :)
> >
> >> QCompleter is very UI orient
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 01 July 2012 14:07:15 Mark wrote:
>> On a related note for KCompletion vs QCompleter.
>> I don't think the two should merge.
>
> I agree :)
>
>> QCompleter is very UI orientated
>> and really meant to hook on to a input field.
>> KComp
On Sunday 01 July 2012 14:07:15 Mark wrote:
> On a related note for KCompletion vs QCompleter.
> I don't think the two should merge.
I agree :)
> QCompleter is very UI orientated
> and really meant to hook on to a input field.
> KCompletion is much more basic, it simply completes the data that's
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:39 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 June 2012 12:08:51 Eike Hein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> lately I'm seeing an increasing number of commits that
>> port things away from kdeui classes, e.g. this one:
>>
>> http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/c87a6aa
>>
>> I'd like to learn m
