Re: kdeui splitup (widgets)

2012-05-05 Thread John Layt
On Friday 04 May 2012 10:17:32 you wrote: > On Thursday 03 May 2012 23:19:38 John Layt wrote: > > > > I'd think we would need all the locale and date classes in K4Support? > > Can't really answer that before seeing what the porting effort from the old > to the new locale stuff will be. If it's not

Re: kdeui splitup (widgets)

2012-05-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
David Faure wrote: > kcompletionwidgets would only contain KLineEdit+KComboBox, and the > completion classes. That's really not much imho. If we put KLineEdit in its own framework, that would already be 4 public classes (KLineEdit, KCompletionBase, KCompletion, KCompletionMatches). A more real

Re: Modified build system for itemmodels

2012-05-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: > attached are prototypes. > > Please have a look (ignore the version-related stuff for now). > > The Use-file is not there anymore, and the Config.cmake.in file is not > there anymore. > Instead it is now generated using the new function > ecm_write_basic_package_config

Re: Modified build system for itemmodels

2012-05-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> >> Why do we need a use file? Qt 5 doesn't create or install them. >> > >> > You added it, so I thought you want to have it. >> > If not, let's remove it. >> >> Yes. > > Ok. I'll remove them in the next days. > Are they used anywhere already ? Thanks. Nope they're n