Re: Please avoid noisy merge commits in frameworks

2012-02-19 Thread Dario Freddi
2012/2/19 Ben Cooksley : > > First, our hooks are in python - so any changes would need to be in Python > as well. I can speak a bit of python, would be a nice way for learning more :) > > Second, there is a legitimate use for pushing merge commits - namely > integrating a seperate remote branch.

Re: Which package will provide the common KDE library version number ?

2012-02-19 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 19 February 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... > > KF5 package, as small as it may be. A library containing only a function > > which returns the version, or something like this. > > Depending on this small (header only ?) > > It would have to be compiled in proba

Re: Which package will provide the common KDE library version number ?

2012-02-19 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Saturday 18 February 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> On Saturday 18 February 2012 18:13:00 Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > On Saturday 18 February 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > > So the other possibility would be to have the version number in the >> > > main CMakeLists.

Re: Please avoid noisy merge commits in frameworks

2012-02-19 Thread Dario Freddi
2012/2/19 Stephen Kelly : > Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> >> Hi there, >> >> I was reviewing the changes in the frameworks branch from yesterday. >> Something I noticed was that there are a lot of merge commits that don't >> need to exist. > > Ugh. Yet more of this just appeared... Recent history in th

libkwindowsystem in staging

2012-02-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi all... there is a new library in staging: libkwindowsystem it pulls in kdeui/windowmanagement/ and Plasma::WindowEffects as well as a few x11 helper classes from kdeui. these helper classes are public API in Platform 4.x but are only used by the classes in libkwindowsystem. as such i've mad

Re: /cmake/modules/ vs. /cmake/

2012-02-19 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: > If some library needs some exotic library, it should be good enough if it > contains the Find-module itself. This wasn't on the wiki page. I added it with the recommendation that such find modules shouldn't be installed. __