Re: version # in frameworks

2011-12-04 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Sunday 04 December 2011 23:53:14 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > this should be bumped imho to reflect that this is the "5.0" version. should > we do the usual "4.90"? Sounds good to me, I even stupidly assumed it was already the case but didn't check. :-) Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsqua

kactivities

2011-12-04 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi.. the Plasma team is working on the kactivities repository with the idea in mind that it is a "frameworks 5" style project right from the start. it currently contains a library (libkactivities), a runtime componen (kactivitymanagerd) and some runtime data (ontologies). what it currently lacks

examples

2011-12-04 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi .. according to this: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies#Framework_directory_structure source code examples are to live in an examples/ directory within the given framework git module. to put it simple: i object :) kdeexamples exists as a way to bring together example code for all

version # in frameworks

2011-12-04 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi.. currently in the top level CMakeLists.txt file in frameworks we have this: set (KDE_VERSION_MAJOR 4) set (KDE_VERSION_MINOR 7) set (KDE_VERSION_RELEASE 40) set (KDE_VERSION "${KDE_VERSION_MAJOR}.${KDE_VERSION_MINOR}. ${KDE_VERSION_RELEASE}" ) set (KDE_VERSION_STRING "${KDE_VERSION} (4.7.40

[kdelibs/frameworks] /: Deprecate KTempDir, with full porting instructions.

2011-12-04 Thread David Faure
Git commit b0bfbf0bd208eab5e145dd11adfdbfd170bcc2ad by David Faure. Committed on 04/12/2011 at 23:41. Pushed by dfaure into branch 'frameworks'. Deprecate KTempDir, with full porting instructions. Volunteers welcome for porting all of kdelibs! CCMAIL: kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org M +1-0K

Re: KF5 current status

2011-12-04 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 04 December 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> ;-) > >> > >>> Hmm, I don't think I'll be able to do that before tomorrow evening. > >> > >> No worries, as I said it'd be ++awesome, but if you do it later no > >> problem. It just need to be don

Re: KF5 current status

2011-12-04 Thread Stephen Kelly
Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > personally i'm impressed and inspired by your actions on the wiki and by > Kevin's efforts to bring the meeting this evening together. in addition to > being a great technology project full of wonderful people, frameworks can > be a lamp light to all of KDE if we take on th

Re: KF5 current status

2011-12-04 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 19:54:30 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Is that about not feeling empowered to do things like that? Is it something > cultural we should look into more? whether it is empowerment, something else or a mix of circumstances, the result does seem to be that often people are hesita

Re: KF5 current status

2011-12-04 Thread Stephen Kelly
Stephen Kelly wrote: > Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> ;-) >>> >>> Hmm, I don't think I'll be able to do that before tomorrow evening. >> >> No worries, as I said it'd be ++awesome, but if you do it later no >> problem. It just need to be done to give more visibility to the >> community, but next week

Re: KF5 current status

2011-12-04 Thread Stephen Kelly
Kevin Ottens wrote: > ;-) >> >> Hmm, I don't think I'll be able to do that before tomorrow evening. > > No worries, as I said it'd be ++awesome, but if you do it later no > problem. It just need to be done to give more visibility to the community, > but next week is fine as well. > I have updat

Re: KF5 current status

2011-12-04 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Saturday 03 December 2011 21:59:20 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Saturday 03 December 2011, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Obviously it would be ++awesome if there's a slight chance to have that > > page ready before tomorrow's IRC meeting (of course if you prefer > > enjoying your week-end I totally