Good Evening!
> > > But
> > > compiling it on windows is a big horror and I've seen, that nearly
> > > any
> > > linux distribution applies many patches to their sources.
> >
> > Many? I had a quick look at Debian (which is usually the worst, and
> > there is only a few (mostly for more recent Op
and the plugins).
>
> I'm not following you here. Can you explain further?
Yes. If you download the sources from the delta page, you get one source
structure for qca and another one for qca-ossl. So I had the oppinion, that
the used qca-ossl plugin is another one as in the kde repos
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 20:16:54 Joachim Langenbach wrote:
> Ok, but the actual one supported doesn't allow easy builds on windows.
The qconf support for windows has gotten better in recent times (the docs are
dated though). Checking for support on the delta mailing list may be useful.
> So I
>
Good morning all,
> > since we need the qca-ossl-plugin within one of our project, I've
> > thought
> > about improving the cmake support.
>
> What problems are you seeing?
>
> Note that cmake is considered a secondary build system for QCA (hence the
>
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 06:09:37 PM Joachim Langenbach wrote:
> Good morning all,
>
> since we need the qca-ossl-plugin within one of our project, I've thought
> about improving the cmake support.
What problems are you seeing?
Note that cmake is considered a secondary build system f
Good morning all,
since we need the qca-ossl-plugin within one of our project, I've thought
about improving the cmake support. Starting with it, I've noticed, that the
plugin consists of only one really big file. So I thought it is much better to
split them up into several files
