Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2018-01-25 Thread James Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/ --- (Updated Jan. 25, 2018, 2:04 p.m.) Status -- This change has been di

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-10-01 Thread James Smith
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 11:59 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-16 Thread James Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/ --- (Updated Feb. 16, 2017, 12:47 p.m.) Review request for Baloo and Vishesh

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-09 Thread James Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2017, 2:19 a.m.) Review request for Baloo and Vishesh Ha

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-06 Thread James Smith
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 11:59 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-06 Thread James Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/ --- (Updated Feb. 6, 2017, 4:56 p.m.) Review request for Baloo and Vishesh Ha

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-05 Thread Matthieu Gallien
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-05 Thread Luigi Toscano
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-04 Thread James Smith
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 11:59 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-04 Thread James Smith
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 11:59 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > Because there was no final decision. > > It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say > that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
> On Feb. 4, 2017, 7:59 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Any reason this has not been commited? Because there was no final decision. It is true that the Baloo database can be regenerated, but I would say that if we avoid a complete rebuild of the database after a Frameworks update, that wou

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2017-02-04 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/#review102382 --- Any reason this has not been commited? - Albert Astals Cid

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2016-12-05 Thread James Smith
> On Dec. 5, 2016, 5:34 a.m., Pinak Ahuja wrote: > > On second thought I'm not too sure if the Cache dir's are more appropriate > > for the Database. According to the spec "$XDG_CACHE_HOME defines the base > > directory relative to which user specific non-essential data files should > > be sto

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2016-12-05 Thread James Smith
> On Dec. 5, 2016, 5:26 a.m., Pinak Ahuja wrote: > > How about moving the existing DB to the new path so that it is not > > recreated? (which is quite expensive) Is there a clean and simple way to do this? I think the best way is to recreate the db in the new location. - James

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2016-12-05 Thread Pinak Ahuja
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/#review101298 --- On second thought I'm not too sure if the Cache dir's are mo

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2016-12-05 Thread Pinak Ahuja
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/#review101297 --- How about moving the existing DB to the new path so that it

Re: Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2016-12-03 Thread Michael Stemle
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/#review101259 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Michael Stemle On Dec. 4, 2016, 4

Review Request 129605: Move the Baloo database into the XDG cache path.

2016-12-03 Thread James Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/ --- Review request for Baloo. Summary (updated) - Move the B