Re: Proposal: archive plasma-pk-updates

2025-04-18 Thread Nate Graham
On 4/17/25 8:42 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: In favour of all three being archived, if there are no objections can someone please file a ticket and i'll handle the archival? Done! Nate

Re: Proposal: archive plasma-pk-updates

2025-04-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! It's sad that Apper hasn't received more love over the years, as it's the closest thing to a feature-complete package manager using PackageKit that we have in the KDE world. That said, even on the GNOME side, gnome-packagekit is essentially abandoned, and Apper on the KDE side would need subst

Re: Proposal: archive plasma-pk-updates

2025-04-17 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:33 AM Nicolas Fella wrote: > Am 16.04.25 um 22:22 schrieb Nate Graham: > > > https://invent.kde.org/system/plasma-pk-updates/-/commits/master?ref_type=heads > > > > > > It has not been ported to Qt 6 nor gotten any meaningful development > > in years. > > +1, makes sense

Re: Proposal: archive plasma-pk-updates

2025-04-16 Thread Nicolas Fella
Am 16.04.25 um 22:22 schrieb Nate Graham: https://invent.kde.org/system/plasma-pk-updates/-/commits/master?ref_type=heads It has not been ported to Qt 6 nor gotten any meaningful development in years. +1, makes sense. Here's some more packagekit frontends for the same consideration: - htt

Proposal: archive plasma-pk-updates

2025-04-16 Thread Nate Graham
https://invent.kde.org/system/plasma-pk-updates/-/commits/master?ref_type=heads It has not been ported to Qt 6 nor gotten any meaningful development in years. Nate