Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-24 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On Thursday 24 February 2011 23:01:02 todd rme wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 20:34:22 todd rme wrote: > >> Or are, for example, plasma developers not > >> bothered by the fact that installing plasmoids and updating plasma > >>

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-24 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 24.02.11 17:01:02, todd rme wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 20:34:22 todd rme wrote: > >> Or are, for example, plasma developers not > >> bothered by the fact that installing plasmoids and updating plasma > >> themes are both

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-24 Thread todd rme
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 20:34:22 todd rme wrote: >> Or are, for example, plasma developers not >> bothered by the fact that installing plasmoids and updating plasma >> themes are both broken? > > Can't speak for anybody else, but it

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-24 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 20:34:22 todd rme wrote: > Or are, for example, plasma developers not > bothered by the fact that installing plasmoids and updating plasma > themes are both broken? Can't speak for anybody else, but it's not something I'm testing regularly. Yes, I care; no my time i

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-24 Thread todd rme
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > Am Montag 14 Februar 2011, 15:35:31 schrieb todd rme: >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> > On Sunday, February 13, 2011 18:20:10 todd rme wrote: >> >> I know this is not the proper place to be discussing bugs, bu

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-21 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Am Montag 14 Februar 2011, 15:35:31 schrieb todd rme: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Sunday, February 13, 2011 18:20:10 todd rme wrote: > >> I know this is not the proper place to be discussing bugs, but I am > >> seeing a worrying pattern of problems with GHNS s

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-14 Thread todd rme
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Sunday, February 13, 2011 18:20:10 todd rme wrote: >> I know this is not the proper place to be discussing bugs, but I am >> seeing a worrying pattern of problems with GHNS since KDE 4.5.  As far >> as I can tell, there are at least 4 G

Re: Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-14 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Sunday, February 13, 2011 18:20:10 todd rme wrote: > I know this is not the proper place to be discussing bugs, but I am > seeing a worrying pattern of problems with GHNS since KDE 4.5. As far > as I can tell, there are at least 4 GHNS implementations that are > currently broken. The plasmoid

Problematic GHNS implementations

2011-02-13 Thread todd rme
I know this is not the proper place to be discussing bugs, but I am seeing a worrying pattern of problems with GHNS since KDE 4.5. As far as I can tell, there are at least 4 GHNS implementations that are currently broken. The plasmoid GHNS system does not remember the plasmoids you installed afte