On Saturday 06 November 2010 16:04:13 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I
> just shoot at the dark and announce it here directly:
>
> Please review M
On Saturday 06 November 2010 22:54:32 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> On Saturday, November 06, 2010 01:04:13 pm Milian Wolff wrote:
> > - the FindKGraphViewer.cmake file: I'm a total cmake n00b and this was
> > mostly a "copy&paste" and then "make it work" result. I'm totally unsure
> > whether thi
On Saturday 13 November 2010 11:45:47 am Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:02:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Milian Wolff va escriure:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> > > re
On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:02:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Milian Wolff va escriure:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> > review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I
>
Albert Astals Cid, 08.11.2010:
> A Dilluns, 8 de novembre de 2010, Burkhard Lück va escriure:
> > Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, um 15:51:29 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > > A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Burkhard Lück va escriure:
> > > > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian
A Dilluns, 8 de novembre de 2010, Burkhard Lück va escriure:
> Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, um 15:51:29 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Burkhard Lück va escriure:
> > > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > >
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, um 01:39:19 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010 23:37:27 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 23:22:30 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > > On Saturday 06 November 2010 16:23:47 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2010, um 15:51:29 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Burkhard Lück va escriure:
> > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org
A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Milian Wolff va escriure:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I
> just shoot at the dark and announce it here directly:
>
> Please revie
A Dissabte, 6 de novembre de 2010, Burkhard Lück va escriure:
> Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> > review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So
On Saturday 06 November 2010 23:37:27 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 23:22:30 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > On Saturday 06 November 2010 16:23:47 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm not
Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 23:22:30 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010 16:23:47 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org
> > > b
On Saturday 06 November 2010 18:43:00 Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010 17:20:37 Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on Saturday 06 November 2010 16:04:13 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org
> >
On Saturday 06 November 2010 16:23:47 Burkhard Lück wrote:
> Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> > review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I
>
On Saturday, November 06, 2010 01:04:13 pm Milian Wolff wrote:
> - the FindKGraphViewer.cmake file: I'm a total cmake n00b and this was
> mostly a "copy&paste" and then "make it work" result. I'm totally unsure
> whether this is correct or not. Considering that I already got a "it does
> not work"
On Saturday 06 November 2010 17:20:37 Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on Saturday 06 November 2010 16:04:13 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> > review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). S
Hi,
on Saturday 06 November 2010 16:04:13 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I
> just shoot at the dark and announce it here directly:
>
> Please r
Am Samstag, 6. November 2010, um 16:04:13 schrieb Milian Wolff:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
> review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I
> just shoot at the dark and announce it here directly:
>
> Please re
Hey all,
I'm not sure on what the procedure is to have a project on git.kde.org be
review (am I supposed to move it somehow to a "kdereview" module?). So I just
shoot at the dark and announce it here directly:
Please review Massif Visualizer for inclusion in KDE Extra Gear SDK:
https://projects
19 matches
Mail list logo
