Re: Network Applet

2013-11-09 Thread Jan Grulich
Hi, Dne So 9. listopadu 2013 07:50, Lindsay Mathieson napsal(a): > Using my VPN connection with the new applet - it provides zero feed back on > connection failures. Just goes italic briefly. > > Is it possible to use the old one? > notifications about VPN failures are already implemented in 0

Re: Network Applet

2013-11-08 Thread Pablo Sanchez
[ Comments below, in-line ] On 11/08/2013 04:50 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: Using my VPN connection with the new applet - it provides zero feed back on connection failures. Just goes italic briefly. Hi Linsday, Is there a bug for the above? IMO, if we're replacing an applet with a less fu

Re: Network Applet

2013-11-08 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
Using my VPN connection with the new applet - it provides zero feed back on connection failures. Just goes italic briefly. Is it possible to use the old one? -- Lindsay signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#u

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-20 Thread Kåre Särs
Hi, On Sunday 20 October 2013 14:10:21 Jan Grulich wrote: > Dne 20.10.2013 12:18, Reindl Harald napsal(a): > > Am 20.10.2013 11:59, schrieb Jan Grulich: > >>> * allow more than one connection to be expanded at a time > >> > >> I don't think is necessary to allow more than one connection to be > >

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-20 Thread Jan Grulich
Dne 20.10.2013 12:18, Reindl Harald napsal(a): Am 20.10.2013 11:59, schrieb Jan Grulich: * allow more than one connection to be expanded at a time I don't think is necessary to allow more than one connection to be expanded, because mostly you are connected only via one connection (or only one

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.10.2013 11:59, schrieb Jan Grulich: >> * allow more than one connection to be expanded at a time > I don't think is necessary to allow more than one connection to be expanded, > because mostly you are connected only > via one connection (or only one is default route) says who? yes, the ma

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-20 Thread Jan Grulich
Dne 19.10.2013 17:21, Aaron J. Seigo napsal(a): On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:27:52 Lindsay Mathieson wrote: On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:56:16 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: What information are you missing? I assume you saw the extra information you get when clicking on the active connection and the

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-20 Thread Jan Grulich
Dne 19.10.2013 17:18, Aaron J. Seigo napsal(a): On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:15:50 Jan Grulich wrote: Here is a screenshot with the second panel: http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=plasmatyt.png my opinion is that the second panel is not a good idea, at least not as shown in the screenshot. reason

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, October 18, 2013 08:27:52 Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:56:16 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > What information are you missing? I assume you saw the extra information > > you get when clicking on the active connection and the wrench? > > The old one had a bandwidth a

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:15:50 Jan Grulich wrote: > Here is a screenshot with the second panel: > http://www.imagehosting.cz/?v=plasmatyt.png my opinion is that the second panel is not a good idea, at least not as shown in the screenshot. reasons: * the icons are not immediately obvious in

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-18 Thread Jan Grulich
Hi, Dne 18.10.2013 00:27, Lindsay Mathieson napsal(a): On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:56:16 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: What information are you missing? I assume you saw the extra information you get when clicking on the active connection and the wrench? The old one had a bandwidth and categorised st

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-17 Thread Daniel Nicoletti
2013/10/17 Lindsay Mathieson : > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:47:39 PM Daniel Nicoletti wrote: >> I don't think you should take it as a dumb down, it's a completely >> new code/approach, and if one wants I'd say it's now easier to >> come with a new UI or even keep the "old" one around for a while >> lon

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-17 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:56:16 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: > What information are you missing? I assume you saw the extra information > you get when clicking on the active connection and the wrench? The old one had a bandwidth and categorised status display visible immediately on clicking. A straig

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-17 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:47:39 PM Daniel Nicoletti wrote: > I don't think you should take it as a dumb down, it's a completely > new code/approach, and if one wants I'd say it's now easier to > come with a new UI or even keep the "old" one around for a while > longer. Fair enough, and sorry, bit of

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-17 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi Lindsay, On Friday, October 18, 2013 07:29:48 Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > Rather to late in the day I know, but I fail to see how the new network > applet is an improvement in any manner. > > - less information What information are you missing? I assume you saw the extra informat

Re: Network Applet

2013-10-17 Thread Daniel Nicoletti
2013/10/17 Lindsay Mathieson : > Rather to late in the day I know, but I fail to see how the new network applet > is an improvement in any manner. > > - less information > > - less control > > - Subjective opinion: Butt ugly > > Users aren't going to be happy

Network Applet

2013-10-17 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
Rather to late in the day I know, but I fail to see how the new network applet is an improvement in any manner. - less information - less control - Subjective opinion: Butt ugly Users aren't going to be happy. The perception will be of a gnome style makeover - dumbing down the U