On Tuesday, 2013-12-24, 12:11:56, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 20:09:21, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > > Well, because I can't do a query if se
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 20:09:21, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > > Hi Ignacio,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 17:55:53, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
>
> > > Maybe you could e
Hi,
- Mail original -
> De: "Vishesh Handa"
> À: kde-devel@kde.org
> Cc: "François K."
> Envoyé: Vendredi 20 Décembre 2013 12:17:57
> Objet: Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond
> >
> > Okay, I'll try to take some time to have a look at i
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 18:31:15 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> > To my knowledge, the list of filesystems with proper xattr support is
> > rather short.
>
> From Wikipedia "In Linux, the ext2, ext3, ext4, JFS, ReiserFS, XFS, Btrfs
> and OCFS2 1.6 filesystems support extended attributes".
> Tha
On Thursday, 2013-12-19, 18:31:15, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> On Thursday 19 December 2013 16:16:32 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > To my knowledge, the list of filesystems with proper xattr support is
> > rather short.
>
> From Wikipedia "In Linux, the ext2, ext3, ext4, JFS, ReiserFS, XFS, Btrfs
> an
> On Friday, December 20, 2013 12:17:57 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > 1. Given a url, return a unique identifier
> > 2. Given a unique identifier, return the url
> >
> > inodes satisfy (1), but not (2).
>
> inodes don't satisfy even (1). They're only unique per filesystem,
> designing
> Baloo around "
On Friday, December 20, 2013 12:17:57 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 1. Given a url, return a unique identifier
> 2. Given a unique identifier, return the url
>
> inodes satisfy (1), but not (2).
inodes don't satisfy even (1). They're only unique per filesystem, designing
Baloo around "computers with on
On Thursday 19 Dec 2013 18:20:59 François K. wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I get it properly.
> I clearly understand that the URL can't be used as identifier since it can
> change.
>
> But if SQLite is used to map the URL and the id, it means that we'll have to
> update the mapping each time the file U
Hi,
- Mail original -
> De: "Sebastian Kügler"
> À: kde-devel@kde.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 19 Décembre 2013 16:16:32
> Objet: Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond
> > > * What are the plans to store tags ? On OSX, tags are stored in
> > > files
> > &
On Thursday 19 December 2013 16:16:32 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday, December 19, 2013 14:48:57 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 Dec 2013 12:09:02 François K. wrote:
> > > Hi Vishesh, hi guys,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm sorry to short-circuit the thread. I deleted Vishesh's orig
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
> > * What are the plans to store tags ? On OSX, tags are stored in
> > files xattrs
> > which is -IMHO- very nice : - Metadata live and die with the file ;
> > - No "store" query when you move or copy a file ;
> > - You don't rely on a "store" to tag files ;
> >
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 14:48:57 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 Dec 2013 12:09:02 François K. wrote:
> > Hi Vishesh, hi guys,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm sorry to short-circuit the thread. I deleted Vishesh's original email
> > by mistake...
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that sounds really excitin
On Wednesday 18 Dec 2013 12:09:02 François K. wrote:
> Hi Vishesh, hi guys,
>
> I'm sorry to short-circuit the thread. I deleted Vishesh's original email by
> mistake...
>
> Well, that sounds really exciting ! Thanks again for your work.
>
> Here are a few thoughts/questions I have since you've
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:09:02PM +0100, François K. wrote:
> I'm sorry to short-circuit the thread. I deleted Vishesh's original email by
> mistake...
You can read it here:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=138684571516431&w=2
It answers many of your questions.
--
Martin Sandsmark
>
Hi Vishesh, hi guys,
I'm sorry to short-circuit the thread. I deleted Vishesh's original email by
mistake...
Well, that sounds really exciting ! Thanks again for your work.
Here are a few thoughts/questions I have since you've made the announcement.
They might be a bit technical, I hope that's
Hi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> Hi Ignacio,
>
> On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 17:55:53, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > Hi Lindsay,
> >
> > You are right, a higher layer will be needed and this is not a Baloo job
> > but if you want to build a layer like this Baloo must run as
On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 20:09:21, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > Hi Ignacio,
> >
> > On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 17:55:53, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > Maybe you could elaborate how a system service would facilitate this kind
> > of
> > sha
Hi Ignacio,
On Tuesday, 2013-12-17, 17:55:53, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> Hi Lindsay,
>
> You are right, a higher layer will be needed and this is not a Baloo job
> but if you want to build a layer like this Baloo must run as a service and
> not as a KDE user level.
>
> From my point of view runni
Hi Lindsay,
You are right, a higher layer will be needed and this is not a Baloo job
but if you want to build a layer like this Baloo must run as a service and
not as a KDE user level.
>From my point of view running Nepomuk at user level was a mistake and I
would like Baloo don't do the same mist
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:22:32 AM Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> I'm not requesting this features now but I think this must be necessary in
> the future and this is the right moment to develop thinking in the future.
> If not when we need this kind of features Baloo will be in a dead end like
> with Nepom
I'm not requesting this features now but I think this must be necessary in
the future and this is the right moment to develop thinking in the future.
If not when we need this kind of features Baloo will be in a dead end like
with Nepomuk.
I think that sharing is not a particular use case and the s
On Thursday 12 December 2013 22:23:23 Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 December 2013, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > > Welcome Baloo,
> > >
> > > New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems
> >
> > related
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 12 December 2013, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > Welcome Baloo,
> >
> > New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems
> related
> > to Nepomuk:
> >
> > 1) Baloo must work as a service to share information wi
On Thursday 12 December 2013, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> Welcome Baloo,
>
> New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems related
> to Nepomuk:
>
> 1) Baloo must work as a service to share information with other users and
> minimize resources consumption. With Nepomuk a login
Welcome Baloo,
New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems related
to Nepomuk:
1) Baloo must work as a service to share information with other users and
minimize resources consumption. With Nepomuk a login is required and in
multiuser environment this is a problem.
2) Data
Hey everyone
During the KDE 4.11 cycle Nepomuk reached a maturity level that we were
happy
with, it is reasonably fast, stable, and unless used together with Akonadi it
is no longer the "CPU consumer" it was before. We reached this state after
years of analyzing what was wrong and what could b
26 matches
Mail list logo