Re: Love for Konqueror

2015-09-07 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Monday 07 September 2015, Dāvis Mosāns wrote: > 2015-09-07 12:10 GMT+03:00 Allan Sandfeld Jensen : > >> I think using [1] CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) could be good idea > >> as then both [2] Blink and [3] Servo can be used. > > > > CEF also doesn't appear to have had an update since Janua

Re: Love for Konqueror

2015-09-07 Thread Dāvis Mosāns
2015-09-07 12:10 GMT+03:00 Allan Sandfeld Jensen : >> I think using [1] CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) could be good idea as >> then both [2] Blink and [3] Servo can be used. >> > CEF also doesn't appear to have had an update since January 2015. It doesn't > appear regularly maintained. I don't

Re: Love for Konqueror

2015-09-07 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Monday 07 September 2015, Dāvis Mosāns wrote: > > So choice is between which actively maintained web engine to use. > Gecko, Servo, Blink or WebKit2? (QtWebEngine is basically > Chromium/Blink wrapper) > QtWebEngine is not just a wrapper. It is a continously rebased fork and stable API (just

Re: Love for Konqueror

2015-09-06 Thread Dāvis Mosāns
2015-09-06 13:27 GMT+03:00 David Faure : > (redirecting to kfm-devel where konqueror development used to happen) > > On Tuesday 09 December 2014 21:10:01 Martin Steigerwald wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I see some discussion in the thread "Re: Is Konqueror still a live project?", >> which seems to be incompl

Re: Love for Konqueror

2015-09-06 Thread David Faure
(redirecting to kfm-devel where konqueror development used to happen) On Tuesday 09 December 2014 21:10:01 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > I see some discussion in the thread "Re: Is Konqueror still a live project?", > which seems to be incomplete in my kmail devel-ml folder tough, but it

Re: Love for Konqueror

2014-12-20 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Samstag, 20. Dezember 2014, 01:26:05 schrieben Sie: > On Friday 19 December 2014 17:54:41 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > However does not seem that anyone misses Konqueror development or > > all too busy with other things. > > Well, I see Andrea is doing regular commits to KHTML. And > Konqueror

Re: Love for Konqueror

2014-12-19 Thread Christoph Feck
On Friday 19 December 2014 17:54:41 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > However does not seem that anyone misses Konqueror development or > all too busy with other things. Well, I see Andrea is doing regular commits to KHTML. And Konqueror/KHTML is still my main browser, if I see a bug, I report it. Chr

Re: Love for Konqueror

2014-12-19 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2014, 09:12:31 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > On Tuesday, 2014-12-09, 21:10:01, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > I miss an updated Konqi. I mean the Konqueror webbrowser. > > > I used it often but I use it less and less as it has various problems: > I use Konqueror as my main brow

Re: Love for Konqueror

2014-12-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Tuesday, 2014-12-09, 21:10:01, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > I miss an updated Konqi. I mean the Konqueror webbrowser. > > I used it often but I use it less and less as it has various problems: I use Konqueror as my main browser, with the WebKit engine. > - websites not rendering correctly wit

Re: Love for Konqueror

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2014, 21:10:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Alternatives all have their weaknesses. > > - Iceweasel / Firefox: I just look at the GTK file dialog box it uses and I > am done with it (sorry, to be honest: One of the worst usability > nightmares *ever*). Or that you cannot

Love for Konqueror

2014-12-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi! I see some discussion in the thread "Re: Is Konqueror still a live project?", which seems to be incomplete in my kmail devel-ml folder tough, but it doesn´t seem it came to any conclusion. I am posting as a user who reports bug, helped with a little performance optimization work and CRM11