Re: Help with a KMail crash

2024-12-04 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Mittwoch, 4. Dezember 2024 09:55:39 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > Hello all, I have a quite annoying kmail crash, tried to debug but the > codebase didn't help much. > The crash happens in `kidentitymanager`, but I believe the culprit is in > kmail its

Re: Help with a KMail crash

2024-12-04 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 09:55 +0100, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > Hello all, I have a quite annoying kmail crash, tried to debug but > the codebase didn't help much. > The crash happens in `kidentitymanager`, but I believe the culprit is > in kmail itself. > on KMail's `i

Re: Help with a KMail crash

2024-12-04 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2024-12-04, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Given that iterators are involved I suspect that shadowIdentities is modified > while it is being iterated over which invalidates the iterator it. There are > some signals emitted in this loop so that there's is a lot of potential for > additional calls to K

Help with a KMail crash

2024-12-04 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
Hello all, I have a quite annoying kmail crash, tried to debug but the codebase didn't help much. The crash happens in `kidentitymanager`, but I believe the culprit is in kmail itself. on KMail's `identitynpage.cpp`, method `slotRemoveIdentity` there are only two rele

kmail reply quoting problem - I'd like to try and fix it

2021-05-23 Thread Barry Scott
I'm seeing a problem with the reply quoting in kmail for HTML emails that I reply to in text mode. The problem is that the quoted text is double spaced. with "> \n" lines. I want to stop that happening. I have tried to figure out where the code that does the quoting is but ha

Kmail plugins

2021-04-05 Thread Slawek Kaplonski
Hi, I'm KDE and Kmail user since some time now. But I'm totally new to its code base. I was recently thinking about some plugin to Kmail but I can't find any documentation about how to write such. Can You maybe point me to some docs about it? Thx in advance -- Pozdrawiam Sławe

Re: Kmail: Gmail (less secure apps) advice for GNU emacs developers.

2020-08-10 Thread Martin Steigerwald
service via name and password, known > as less-secure-apps. The main email reader of GNU Emacs, called gnus > relies on this method. Someone on the GNU emacs developer list > suggested that kmail solved the problem and is able to connect to the > GMAIL imap server using their OAuth

Kmail: Gmail (less secure apps) advice for GNU emacs developers.

2020-08-10 Thread Uwe Brauer
of GNU Emacs, called gnus relies on this method. Someone on the GNU emacs developer list suggested that kmail solved the problem and is able to connect to the GMAIL imap server using their OAuth2 method. So the question is addressed to the kmail developers, but I could not find an active mailing

How can I get KMail to produce a core dump?

2019-08-16 Thread Franklin, Jason
Greetings, Distributor ID: Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) Release:10 Codename: buster Kernel Release: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 Lately, KMail has been segfaulting at almost every invocation. I wanted to review a core dump for KMail, but cordumpctl doesn't lis

Re: kmail crash reading this list

2014-08-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
re's a traceback, made on 10.9.4 (for once I'm running > that natively :)): > > ... > > If so, the scope could be bigger than just kmail; anything trying to add a > title to a menu could be concerned. Are there other examples of such use of > KMenu::addTitle? http://lx

kmail crash reading this list

2014-08-26 Thread René J.V. Bertin
get::insertAction(QAction*, QAction*) + 287 frame #12: 0x000100203a2a libkdeui.5.dylib`KMenu::addTitle(this=, icon=, text=, before=) + 298 at kmenu.cpp:193 frame #13: 0x0001002038c5 libkdeui.5.dylib`KMenu::addTitle(this=, text=, before=) + 53 at kmenu.cpp:172 frame #14: 0x

Re: gsoc 14:enhanced searching in Kmail

2014-03-20 Thread Vishesh Handa
SoC 2014. Specifically, I'm interested in > "Enhanced Searching in Kmail". > > I have been using C++ from past 2 years and build a lot of projects and > also used it STL and also have some experience in using Qt and so i want > know from where i should start working for

Re: [GSoC 2014] Enhanced Searching in KMail

2014-03-20 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:29:36 AM Janardhan Reddy wrote: > Hi, Hey Janardhan > I am A Janardhan Reddy, currently studying final year at IIT Madras. I was > a gsoc student for digikam in 2012. I liked the idea of enhanced searching > in kmail. I have compiled and set up km

gsoc 14:enhanced searching in Kmail

2014-03-19 Thread abhilakshya kamboj
Hi My name is Abhilakshya . I'm an undergrad at the National Institute of Technology,Kurukshetra pursuing a B.Tech in Information Technology. I'm interested in working for KDE in GSoC 2014. Specifically, I'm interested in "Enhanced Searching in Kmail". I have been using

[GSoC 2014] Enhanced Searching in KMail

2014-03-19 Thread Janardhan Reddy
Hi, I am A Janardhan Reddy, currently studying final year at IIT Madras. I was a gsoc student for digikam in 2012. I liked the idea of enhanced searching in kmail. I have compiled and set up kmail. I was wondering if i someone could provide some starting point to write proposal. I have done a

Re: [GSoC 2014] Enhanced Searching in KMail

2014-02-12 Thread Vishesh Handa
lly merge my > project into Boost trunk. > > As a part of my course on Information Retrieval and Extraction, I recently > did a project on searching for queries on the latest 40 gb wikipedia dump. > I was going through the KDE ideas page and got pretty excited when I read > about

[GSoC 2014] Enhanced Searching in KMail

2014-02-12 Thread Nikhar Agrawal
Extraction, I recently did a project on searching for queries on the latest 40 gb wikipedia dump. I was going through the KDE ideas page and got pretty excited when I read about Enhanced Searching in KMail project. I couldn't find the contact details of respective mentors. Hence, I am sending the ma

Re: Kmail API: deleting emails from a kmail maildir folder.

2012-04-20 Thread Kevin Krammer
tored in maildirs belonging to > kmail. (I mean kmail receives, handles and stores the emails, but I'd like > a 3rd-party software to delete the emails under certain conditions). What version of KMail / KDE PIM are you targetting? In a KMail 2 / KDE PIM 4.7 setup programmatic acce

Re: Kmail API: deleting emails from a kmail maildir folder.

2012-04-20 Thread Kevin Krammer
at about regenerating indexes? > > Hello, > > as you can already remove email from others softwares (webmail for > exemple), i hope and i'm sure akonadi already deal with metadata/indexes > for this case... That's different, that changes mail on the IMAP server

Re: Kmail API: deleting emails from a kmail maildir folder.

2012-04-20 Thread Cedric Bellegarde
Le vendredi 20 avril 2012 23:08:41 augustin a écrit : > But where I am a bit uncertain, is how to handle the deletion of the > emails. Deleting a specific email is certainly easy (delete the > corresponding file), but what about regenerating indexes? Hello, as you can already remove email from o

Kmail API: deleting emails from a kmail maildir folder.

2012-04-20 Thread augustin
Hello, I'd like to write an application to help me programmatically sort and delete some emails that are currently stored in maildirs belonging to kmail. (I mean kmail receives, handles and stores the emails, but I'd like a 3rd-party software to delete the emails under certain

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 12 de July de 2011 01:43:03 Rui Maciel wrote: > It's clearly an overreaction. This entire thread is about the negative > impact that the dependency on akonadi has on a very specific and > infrequent use of kmail. You mean email is an infrequent use of KMail? What do

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Rui Maciel
On 07/11/2011 04:32 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: > Either way your original question could have been posed as "Have you tried > checking out a pre-Akonadi version of KMail" instead of "Have you tried > checking out an older version from the pre-Akonadi& related cruft days

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Rui Maciel
On 07/11/2011 09:47 AM, Tom Albers wrote: > Can I also remind everyone at the severe 'kmail-ate-my-mails' from the KMail1 > days? There have been numerous reports that KMail ate mails in certain > circumstance. Offline IMAP could potentially corrupt data when hitting > c

Re: Design of PIM, etc. (was Build KMail only?)

2011-07-11 Thread Ian Wadham
es on each other for certain tasks, e.g. >>> KAddressBook and KOrganizer depended on KMail for access to certain type >>> of groupware data and I think KMail vice versa depended on KOrganizer >>> for handling events/invitations attached to email. >>> >>>

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Tuesday, 2011-07-12, Moritz Hobe wrote: > Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 23:58:52 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > > > > Good thing then that this didn't happen. > > > > KMail2 was introduced in a m

Re: Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Moritz Hobe
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 23:58:52 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > > > Good thing then that this didn't happen. > > > KMail2 was introduced in a minor release (KDEPIM 4.6. 0), the last > > > maintena

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:58:52 +0200 schrieb Kevin Krammer : > > Ok. > > So it is the distries that pushed KDEPIM 4.6.0 with all the KDE > > 4.6.X updates (forgot what X it was). > > Are there any distributions that have KDEPIM 4.6.0 enabled outside > their experiemental repositories? Arch for one,

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > > So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most > > > severe issues are sorted out with th

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 14:39:00 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most > > severe issues are sorted out with the new stack or use an older version. > > Recommending you a

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Monday, 2011-07-11, Matthias Fuchs wrote: > So if you ever plan to use KMail you should either wait until the most > severe issues are sorted out with the new stack or use an older version. > Recommending you anything different for a production system would imo be > irresponsible a

Re: Design of PIM, etc. (was Build KMail only?)

2011-07-11 Thread Kevin Krammer
applications can > >> exist independently of each other, in a loosely bound form. > > > > This is exactly how the new PIM applications are designed. Previous > > incarnations had dependencies on each other for certain tasks, e.g. > > KAddressBook and KOrganizer d

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Matthias Fuchs
t was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than > > KMail1. > > A lot of these have to do with the additional integration. > > > > So there is a lot of promise what the whole stack can be in the > > future, imo it > > just does not live up to it ye

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Tom Albers
f these have to do with the additional integration. > > So there is a lot of promise what the whole stack can be in the > future, imo it > just does not live up to it yet. Can I also remind everyone at the severe 'kmail-ate-my-mails' from the KMail1 days? There have been

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs: > I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than KMail1. Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than KMail1. A lot of these have to do with the additional integration. So there is a lot of promise

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-11 Thread Matthias Fuchs
o do KDE app development on the Mac desktop > and that seems attractive to me. I am a KDE Games developer. > > I would like to use KMail as my preferred email app, but am having > trouble with that port. It won't run because it wants Akonadi and then > it wants MySql and who k

Re: Design of PIM, etc. (was Build KMail only?)

2011-07-10 Thread Ian Wadham
each other, in a loosely bound form. > > This is exactly how the new PIM applications are designed. Previous > incarnations had dependencies on each other for certain tasks, e.g. > KAddressBook and KOrganizer depended on KMail for access to certain type of > groupware data a

Re: Design of PIM, etc. (was Build KMail only?)

2011-07-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
lications are designed. Previous incarnations had dependencies on each other for certain tasks, e.g. KAddressBook and KOrganizer depended on KMail for access to certain type of groupware data and I think KMail vice versa depended on KOrganizer for handling events/invitations attached to email.

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Michael Pyne
, you might want to be more specific with your complaints. For instance, one thing you said (even in your clarifying email) was that Akonadi is something unpleasant which has accumulated over time, and "unpleasant" is hardly a technical term. An actual technical complaint would b

Design of PIM, etc. (was Build KMail only?)

2011-07-10 Thread Ian Wadham
; approved. Yet, the latter doesn't help anyone in any way, including > getting kmail to build on a platform which doesn't provide Akonadi, and > only adds noise to this mailing list. Heh, heh, with friends like Rui who needs enemies? ... :-) Seriously, though, I was greatly

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Rui Maciel
very clear on what I've said. So you can at least try to understand what has been said, which wasn't the insult you perceived, or you can keep on overreacting because someone used a word you didn't approved. Yet, the latter doesn't help anyone in any way, including getting k

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Sunday, 2011-07-10, Tom Albers wrote: > - Oorspronkelijk bericht - > > > Have you tried checking out an older version from the pre-Akonadi & > > related cruft days? > > Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very disrespectful. > I suggest you read the CoC: http://www.

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Thomas Lübking
x27;. I think this is just a misconception of the word "cruft" - which according to Webster's doesn't even exist :-P He's probably talking about "the whole megillah" (yiddish, but the only english idiom near "dem ganzen Rattenschwanz" that i know) Since kma

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Lydia Pintscher
efinition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates over > time".  This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other > dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other > platforms.  Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't d

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Tom Albers
The definition of "cruft" is "anything unpleasant that accumulates > over > time". This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other > dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other > platforms. Akonadi may have it's value, which isn&#

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Rui Maciel
time". This discussion is about the problems that Akonadi and other dependencies represent to those who wish to port KMail to other platforms. Akonadi may have it's value, which isn't disputed here, but you have to agree that in this case it represents an unpleasant addition to

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Tom Albers
- Oorspronkelijk bericht - > Have you tried checking out an older version from the pre-Akonadi & > related cruft days? Calling technology of fellow community members cruft is very disrespectful. I suggest you read the CoC: http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/ Best, -- Tom Albers >> Vi

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Rui Maciel
On 07/10/2011 09:14 AM, Ian Wadham wrote: > Oh well, I tried. Working on a Macbook in Apple OS X with PIM software ported > by Macports, I got as far as having KMail, Akonadi and MySql playing together, > after some difficulty. Then it asked for Nepomuk and "resource agents"

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-10 Thread Ian Wadham
On 02/07/2011, at 4:15 AM, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > On Thursday 23 June 2011 08.40.02 Ian Wadham wrote: >> Can I build KMail without Akonadi, etc? If so, how? > > Short: no (as already stated) > > Long: Akonadi is used by most PIM application including KMail as a backend

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-01 Thread Torgny Nyblom
On Thursday 23 June 2011 08.40.02 Ian Wadham wrote: [...] > Can I build KMail without Akonadi, etc? If so, how? Short: no (as already stated) Long: Akonadi is used by most PIM application including KMail as a backend for storing data including mails. Sure this is backed by traditional mbox

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-07-01 Thread Sebastian Kügler
, 2011, Ian Wadham va escriure: > >> >> Can I build KMail without Akonadi, etc? > >> > > >> > No (or maybe you could but it would be mostly useless :D) > >> > >> Maybe that deserves a better answer. ;) > > > > I was hoping for one .

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-06-30 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Ian Wadham wrote: > On Thursday 30 June 2011 1:33:07 am Tomaz Canabrava wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > A Wednesday, June 22, 2011, Ian Wadham va escriure: >> >> Can I build KMail without

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-06-30 Thread Ian Wadham
On Thursday 30 June 2011 1:33:07 am Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Wednesday, June 22, 2011, Ian Wadham va escriure: > >> Can I build KMail without Akonadi, etc? > > > > No (or maybe you could but it would be

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-06-29 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Wednesday, June 22, 2011, Ian Wadham va escriure: >> Can I build KMail without Akonadi, etc? > > No (or maybe you could but it would be mostly useless :D) Maybe that deserves a better answer. ;) Akonadi is not anoth

Re: Build KMail only?

2011-06-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Wednesday, June 22, 2011, Ian Wadham va escriure: > Can I build KMail without Akonadi, etc? No (or maybe you could but it would be mostly useless :D) Albert >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

Build KMail only?

2011-06-22 Thread Ian Wadham
am a KDE Games developer. I would like to use KMail as my preferred email app, but am having trouble with that port. It won't run because it wants Akonadi and then it wants MySql and who knows how much else. The library versions I have on the Macbook are KDE 4.6.4. I do not need the other KD

Re: KMail Layouts

2011-05-15 Thread Kevin Krammer
Hi Anthony, On Thursday, 2011-05-12, Anthony Gabrielson wrote: > Hello, > I've been looking through the kdepim source for the kmail layouts and > I'm > having a tough time finding it. If anyone has any ideas I would > appreciate a pointer. If you mean layout in s

Re: KMail Layouts

2011-05-13 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 19:32:07 Anthony Gabrielson wrote: > Hello, > I've been looking through the kdepim source for the kmail layouts and > I'm > having a tough time finding it. If anyone has any ideas I would appreciate > a pointer. I suggest asking the

KMail Layouts

2011-05-11 Thread Anthony Gabrielson
Hello, I've been looking through the kdepim source for the kmail layouts and I'm having a tough time finding it. If anyone has any ideas I would appreciate a pointer. Thanks, Anthony >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

Re: KMail

2011-04-25 Thread Kevin Krammer
Hello Anthony, On Monday, 2011-04-25, Anthony Gabrielson wrote: > Hello, >I would like to try to add a few features to kmail and I'm hoping for a > little bit of a push in the right direction. I'm working on a Fedora 14 > box so it would appear that I should start with

Re: KMail

2011-04-24 Thread Vitor Boschi
Hi Anthony, It's usually best to get the most up to date source code when developing new features, which means retrieving it from git. The reason you didn't find kmail in kdepimlibs is because this package contains just the libraries, not the applications themselves. 1) KMail is in

Re: KMail

2011-04-24 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Anthony Gabrielson writes: >I would like to try to add a few features to kmail and I'm hoping for a > little bit of a push in the right direction. I'm working on a Fedora 14 box > so it would appear that I should start with kdepimlibs-4.6.2-1 src rpm. So > with t

KMail

2011-04-24 Thread Anthony Gabrielson
Hello, I would like to try to add a few features to kmail and I'm hoping for a little bit of a push in the right direction. I'm working on a Fedora 14 box so it would appear that I should start with kdepimlibs-4.6.2-1 src rpm. So with that said I here are my questions: 1

Re: kmail without nepomuk

2011-03-23 Thread John Layt
On Wednesday 23 Mar 2011 00:21:23 jam wrote: > Guys, without starting a flame war, the whole nepomuk shebang ruined the > best mailer around. > > [info] I use gnome not kde. Every single time I start kmail on any of my > machines I need to start kmail twice. Once with 'n

Re: kmail without nepomuk

2011-03-23 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi, On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 01:21:23 jam wrote: > Guys, without starting a flame war, the whole nepomuk shebang ruined the > best mailer around. If you don't want a flamewar started, why are you being so polarizing? > [info] I use gnome not kde. Every single time I start kmai

Re: kmail without nepomuk

2011-03-22 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 01:21:23 AM jam wrote: > Guys, without starting a flame war, the whole nepomuk shebang ruined the > best mailer around. > > [info] I use gnome not kde. Every single time I start kmail on any of my > machines I need to start kmail twice. Once wi

kmail without nepomuk

2011-03-22 Thread jam
Guys, without starting a flame war, the whole nepomuk shebang ruined the best mailer around. [info] I use gnome not kde. Every single time I start kmail on any of my machines I need to start kmail twice. Once with 'nepomuk not running' [report] [close], also with 'Nepomuk sea