Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-12-01 Thread Nick Shaforostoff
--- Исходное сообщение --- От кого: "Vishesh Handa" Дата: 26 ноября 2014, 18:11:13 > > Hey Nick > > > I noticed that you ported the po extractor of Strigi to KFileMetadata. > However, you didn't go through review or actually discuss this change > anywhere, which is quite sad. > >

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Burkhard Lück wrote: > > If we really want them, then perhaps we can add a developer mode? > > Don't we already have a kind of developer mode, because Joe User does not > have > any po files on his disk and therefore no indexing happens? Of course. I was more c

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Donnerstag, 27. November 2014 18:22:36 CEST, Lasse Liehu wrote: Do they really install .po files instead of properly compiled .mo files? Seems so - it's probably python related? I attached an english .po, installed by the weather.wunderground addon. Cheers, Thomas# XBMC Media Center languag

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Lasse Liehu
2014-11-27 18:55 GMT+02:00 Thomas Lübking : > On Donnerstag, 27. November 2014 17:49:49 CEST, Burkhard Lück wrote: > >> Don't we already have a kind of developer mode, because Joe User does not >> have any po files on his disk and therefore no indexing happens? > > > cups will likely install few. x

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Donnerstag, 27. November 2014 17:49:49 CEST, Burkhard Lück wrote: Don't we already have a kind of developer mode, because Joe User does not have any po files on his disk and therefore no indexing happens? cups will likely install few. xbmc will likely install some few hundreds (to the use

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Lasse Liehu
2014-11-27 18:21 GMT+02:00 Vishesh Handa : > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> >> > It really seems to specialized. >> >> What's wrong with specialized? Our software is used in very specialized >> environments, and often the argument to do so is one of these "fringe" >

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Burkhard Lück
Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2014, 17:21:28 schrieb Vishesh Handa: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > It really seems to specialized. > > > > What's wrong with specialized? Our software is used in very specialized > > environments, and often the argument to do so is

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > It really seems to specialized. > > What's wrong with specialized? Our software is used in very specialized > environments, and often the argument to do so is one of these "fringe" > features which we support very well. That sets us ap

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, November 27, 2014 12:28:44 Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimecres, 26 de novembre de 2014, a les 19:11:11, Vishesh Handa va > > > > > > I noticed that you ported the po extractor of Strigi to KFileMetadata. > > > However, you

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-27 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimecres, 26 de novembre de 2014, a les 19:11:11, Vishesh Handa va > escriure: > > Hey Nick > > > > I noticed that you ported the po extractor of Strigi to KFileMetadata. > > However, you didn't go through review or actually discuss t

Re: KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 26 de novembre de 2014, a les 19:11:11, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > Hey Nick > > I noticed that you ported the po extractor of Strigi to KFileMetadata. > However, you didn't go through review or actually discuss this change > anywhere, which is quite sad. > > I'm going to have to r

KFileMetaData and po Extractor

2014-11-26 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey Nick I noticed that you ported the po extractor of Strigi to KFileMetadata. However, you didn't go through review or actually discuss this change anywhere, which is quite sad. I'm going to have to revert the commit. Could you please go through the proper channels? Also, I'm not really sure if