just saw this thread, and thought i should comment in on it, hope it comes
to the right place when replying direct to ml..
the most important thing about LLM's (private or public) is that they do
not become a strong dependency integrated in other stuff,
thinking mainly on the info about KTextAddon
On 12/4/23 22:45, Alexander Semke wrote:
On Montag, 4. Dezember 2023 12:09:43 CET Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote:
I agree with the concerns Josh raises about the energy consumption of
training LLMs (see, e.g., [1]). A benefit of satisfying the above
characteristics is it is then possible for us
On Montag, 4. Dezember 2023 12:09:43 CET Joseph P. De Veaugh-Geiss wrote:
> I agree with the concerns Josh raises about the energy consumption of
> training LLMs (see, e.g., [1]). A benefit of satisfying the above
> characteristics is it is then possible for us to measure the energy
> consumption f
Hi,
On 12/2/23 13:00, kde-devel-requ...@kde.org wrote:
Hey Loren,
I agree with everyone else that as long as the model is ethically sourced and
local-by-default (which is my two main problems with modern LLMs.) I see no
qualms about including such a frontend in KDE.
Re ethical LLMs Nextcloud
On Saturday, December 2, 2023 4:33:39 PM EST you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Loren, what do you think of the idea?
>
Looks like an interesting concept for sure! I imagine you could probably
achieve that with ChatGPT by setting a system prompt that told ChatGPT that it
will be given a math problem and it
Hi again,
On Saturday, 02 December 2023 22:33:39 CET Andre Heinecke wrote:
> Anyhow! Back to topic!
Btw. This commit is a very good example how I use GPT-3.5 in day to day life:
https://dev.gnupg.org/rW2cc0f90e94f905f552e7a51263d882d626ad7ec6
That commit was mostly LLM generated. I only very re
02.12.2023 15:08:47 Carl Schwan :
> On Friday, December 1, 2023 5:44:26?AM CET Andre Heinecke wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Friday, 01 December 2023 03:53:22 CET Loren Burkholder wrote:
>>> they can be quite useful for tasks like programming.
>>
>> I need it desperately for intelligent spellchecking /
02.12.2023 15:08:47 Carl Schwan :
> On Friday, December 1, 2023 5:44:26?AM CET Andre Heinecke wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Friday, 01 December 2023 03:53:22 CET Loren Burkholder wrote:
>>> they can be quite useful for tasks like programming.
>>
>> I need it desperately for intelligent spellchecking /
On Friday, December 1, 2023 5:44:26?AM CET Andre Heinecke wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Friday, 01 December 2023 03:53:22 CET Loren Burkholder wrote:
> > they can be quite useful for tasks like programming.
>
> I need it desperately for intelligent spellchecking / grammar fixes ??
>
> > Should we be joini
Ahh, I forgot one thing -- interspersed below:
On Saturday, December 02, 2023 08:21:46 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, December 01, 2023 07:59:22 AM AnnoyingRains wrote:
> > I see no issue with this at all!
> > As long as the training data is ethically obtained and it uses KDE's
> > tech
On Friday, December 01, 2023 07:59:22 AM AnnoyingRains wrote:
> I see no issue with this at all!
> As long as the training data is ethically obtained and it uses KDE's
> tech stack, I feel like this app could integrate fine, if it is as you
> have described it so far!
Just chiming in from the pean
Hey Loren,
I agree with everyone else that as long as the model is ethically sourced and
local-by-default (which is my two main problems with modern LLMs.) I see no
qualms about including such a frontend in KDE.
I think the hardest part will be the marketing around this new software. One
of ou
I see no issue with this at all!
As long as the training data is ethically obtained and it uses KDE's
tech stack, I feel like this app could integrate fine, if it is as you
have described it so far!
- Kye Potter
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:41 PM Loren Burkholder
wrote:
>
> > I don't think so. I h
> I don't think so. I have the slight feeling that you want to start an
> abstract
> discussion here and then magically the "KDE Community" will develop
> something.
> Just do it or don't. It will always be in the users freedom to use it or not.
> I would love to have an optional KMail plugin
+1 to what Ethan B. said i.e.:
> I am anti-LLM on the grounds that the training sets were created without the
> original authors' consent. I see no issue with a libre/ethical LLM, if there
> is one, though. If a developer or team of developers wants to implement a Qt
> and KDE-integrated LL
On Thursday, November 30th, 2023 at 8:53 PM, Loren Burkholder
wrote:
>
>
> Howdy, everyone!
>
> You are all undoubtedly aware of the buzz around LLMs for the past year. Of
> course, there are many opinions on LLMs, ranging from "AI is the
> future/endgame for web search or programming or eve
Hi.
On Friday, 01 December 2023 03:53:22 CET Loren Burkholder wrote:
> they can be quite useful for tasks like programming.
I need it desperately for intelligent spellchecking / grammar fixes 😅
> From a technical standpoint, such an app would be fairly easy to implement.
> It could rely on Ollam
Howdy, everyone!
You are all undoubtedly aware of the buzz around LLMs for the past year. Of
course, there are many opinions on LLMs, ranging from "AI is the future/endgame
for web search or programming or even running your OS" to "AI should be avoided
like the plague because it hallucinates an
18 matches
Mail list logo
