Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-01-08 12:00 GMT+01:00 Richard Hughes : > On 6 January 2017 at 19:26, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> Oh, really? Because the spec says the name/summary is taken from the >> .desktop file if the metainfo doesn't contain it, which IMHO was a bad >> idea (while reducing the amount of metadata one need

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-08 Thread Richard Hughes
On 6 January 2017 at 19:26, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Oh, really? Because the spec says the name/summary is taken from the > .desktop file if the metainfo doesn't contain it, which IMHO was a bad > idea (while reducing the amount of metadata one needed to write, it > also made metainfo files less u

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-01-04 21:43 GMT+01:00 Richard Hughes : > On 4 January 2017 at 16:55, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> @hughsie: I am wondering for some time now whether we should make the name >> and summary tags essential for desktop-application type components in >> metainfo files as well. > > For appstream-glib,

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-04 Thread Richard Hughes
On 4 January 2017 at 16:55, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > @hughsie: I am wondering for some time now whether we should make the name > and summary tags essential for desktop-application type components in > metainfo files as well. For appstream-glib, it is. >This would make validation a bit more fail

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
(sorry for the top post, my phone refuses to let me do an inline reply) It is worth noting that the KDE CI checks metainfo files and will complain on issues - so if you don't see something there, maybe a fix needs to be backported. @hughsie: I am wondering for some time now whether we should make

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-04 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
> ‎* org.kde.spectacle I added a Thanks.

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-04 Thread Richard Hughes
On 4 January 2017 at 15:48, Luigi Toscano wrote: > I understand that the applications checked are "the current set part of Fedora > 25", but given that we will have few updates soon for example for KDE > Applications, would it be possible to list also the version of the package > that was analyzed

Re: AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-04 Thread Luigi Toscano
Richard Hughes ha scritto: > Hi all, > > We've been looking at the AppStream extractor issues in Fedora 25, and > we've come across quite a few broken KDE applications. Broken apps are > not visible in the Ubuntu, Fedora or OpenSUSE application installers. > The apps include: > > * Kjots > * br

AppStream issues with various KDE applications

2017-01-04 Thread Richard Hughes
Hi all, We've been looking at the AppStream extractor issues in Fedora 25, and we've come across quite a few broken KDE applications. Broken apps are not visible in the Ubuntu, Fedora or OpenSUSE application installers. The apps include: * Kjots * braindump * choqok * kgraphviewer * konquero