Thank you Nate and Johannes for your positive feedback. If there are no
further complaints / comments, I'll edit the Commit Policy wiki page
tomorrow and add the points I listed below.
Cheers,
Julian / xyquadrat
On 18.09.20 10:05, Julian / xyquadrat wrote:
Hi all,
A few months b
"more consistent padding in
dialogs") are not interesting to users.
* Shifts in technology that do not affect the behavior of the product
(e.g. /porting from library X version Y to library X version Y+1/)
* Minor changes to tools and backends used in the development process
Feedback and criticism is much appreciated.
Cheers and have a nice day,
Julian / xyquadrat
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 8:34 PM XYQuadrat m...@xyquadrat.ch wrote:
If we implement such a system (that is, just resurrect what is already
present), I definitely think it would be sensible to make guidelines on
what commits we are interested in publicly available.
The thing I'm not su
OG commits from a given date range - can someone more
experienced with our git/repo infrastructure shed some light here?
Best regards,
Julian / xyquadrat
On 17.04.20 01:19, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
On Donnerstag, 16. April 2020 23:15:18 CEST Nate Graham wrote:
On 4/16/20 2:38 PM, Albert Astals
