Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-19 Thread Gleb Popov
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:47 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > - FreeBSD Qt 6.9 monitors buildability on BSD libc + Clang + Qt 6.9 FreeBSD is at Qt 6.8 at the moment. We're close to updating to 6.9 though.

Re: KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master) (11 March 2025)

2025-03-12 Thread Gleb Popov
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 1:49 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > kdevelop - NEW > * https://invent.kde.org/kdevelop/kdevelop/-/pipelines/907992 > * freebsd dependencies missing? FreeBSD switched to LLVM 19 by default. I see the job passes CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/builds/kdevelop/kdevelop/_install:/usr/

Re: KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master) (21 January 2025)

2025-01-25 Thread Gleb Popov
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 1:38 AM David Jarvie wrote: > > This is due to a bug introduced in Qt 6.8 on FreeBSD. I wrote a 3 line test > snippet to demonstrate the bug, and tried to report the bug on the Qt bug > tracker. However, in its Platform drop-down, there was no FreeBSD option. Is > FreeBS

Re: Major CI changes - FreeBSD and Linux

2024-01-22 Thread Gleb Popov
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:09 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Hi all, > > Over the past few weeks significant work has been undertaken to develop the > ability to make use of containerised builds for FreeBSD. This is great news! Thank you for all the work done on that front.

Re: Can we rename gitklient?

2023-03-02 Thread Gleb Popov
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:33 PM Hamed Masafi wrote: > > Considering that gitklient is very close to the first version, I have to say > something about its naming. > When I started the project, no name came to my mind. Of course, it is the > same now. That's why, just so that the name of the proje

Re: Gitlab CI Dashboards and retirement of build.kde.org

2022-09-03 Thread Gleb Popov
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 7:46 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As previously indicated, I have now shutdown build.kde.org along with the > domain that supported it's version of the CI tooling. > The repository containing that tooling has now also been archived, and the > former build.kde.org domain has

Re: Rollout of Gitlab CI

2021-10-03 Thread Gleb Popov
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 10:40 AM Ben Cooksley wrote: > As an update to this, work on FreeBSD and Android support is progressing > well and should be made available within the next week all going well. > As a FreeBSD user I'm extremely excited about this. Thanks for all your hard work! Cheers, >

Re: Trying to build knotifications framework, kdesrc-build and qt5

2021-08-02 Thread Gleb Popov
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:26 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Your Qt is broken. > > /usr/local/lib/libQt5Core.so.5: undefined symbol: u_strToUpper_68 > This symbol comes from the icu library. There is a setting that adds version suffixes like "_68" to every symbol. It seems that Qt runs into a hea

Re: Broken KRFB Build on non-linux platforms

2020-09-18 Thread Gleb Popov
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:16 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi Aleix, > > Recently you committed some Linux only changes to KRFB. Unfortunately > these changes were not guarded accordingly, and have therefore broken the > build on all other platforms (FreeBSD in particular). > > Can you please correct

Re: Update on Status of Gitlab Migration

2020-04-11 Thread Gleb Popov
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:36 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Good morning Community, > > I'm pleased to report that this week we reached a major milestone, > with all the necessary technical components now being in place on our > side for our migration to Gitlab to take place. > > This includes the repl

Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration

2019-02-28 Thread Gleb Popov
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:43 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:13 AM Nate Graham wrote: > > > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 23:02:03 -0700 Ben Cooksley > wrote > > > In terms of server load, it would be nice if the setup of forks was > > > still something the developer had

Re: Gitlab Evaluation & Migration

2019-02-23 Thread Gleb Popov
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 1:44 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the past few months a small group of KDE projects have been > evaluating Gitlab as a replacement for Phabricator, and we’ve now > reached the point where we’re ready to have a community wide > discussion regarding whether we’d