Hi,
On Thursday, July 3rd, 2025 at 18:50, Łukasz Wojniłowicz
wrote:
>
>
> On 25-07-03 18:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > Am 03.07.25 um 18:27 schrieb Łukasz Wojniłowicz:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > recently I got an answer like at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?
> > > id=506334#c1
Hi,
On Monday, June 2nd, 2025 at 13:40, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
> For some time now we have had a variety of issues with our Docker/Podman
> based CI builds. These have included the lack of GUI test support on Windows,
> periodic crashes on FreeBSD, poor IO performance of Windows builds
Hi,
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/merge_requests/698
would still benefit from some input on how to proceed in this very concrete
case.
Greetings
Christoph
On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 16:56, Christoph Cullmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sunday, May 1
Hi,
On Monday, May 19th, 2025 at 02:37, Justin Zobel wrote:
> On 19/05/2025 06:05, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>
> > On Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025 21:32:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ingo Klöcker
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, there is the theoretical threat that an AI learned code that's under
> > > a
>
Hi,
>
>
> On Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025 21:32:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Ingo Klöcker
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, there is the theoretical threat that an AI learned code that's under a
> > less liberal license like the GPL or even under one of the "new" not-OSI-
> > approved licenses used by certain
Hi,
>
>
> On Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025 16:52:00 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Christoph
> Cullmann wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 09:12, Albert Vaca Cintora
>
> albertv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 08:59 Justin Zobel, j
Hi,
On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 09:00, Justin Zobel wrote:
> On 17/05/2025 01:40, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > just as a concrete example: what to do with
> >
> > https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/merge_requests/
Hi,
On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 09:12, Albert Vaca Cintora
wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2025, 08:59 Justin Zobel, wrote:
>
> > If the contributor cannot tell you the license(s) of the code that was used
> > to generate the code, then it's literally gambling that this code wasn't
> > taken fro
Hi,
just as a concrete example: what to do with
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/syntax-highlighting/-/merge_requests/698
That is no AI spam but something that doesn't look broken and the submitter did
do manual work.
Can I now accept that just as MIT?
Greetings
Christoph
signature.asc
Desc
Hi,
On Monday, May 12th, 2025 at 16:19, Harald Sitter wrote:
>
>
> It being generated by AI is not the same as it being low quality
> though? Are we against low quality or against AI?
I think there is a big difference between just low quality and AI.
Naturally high quality contributions ar
On Friday, May 2nd, 2025 at 22:18, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 3:27 AM Christoph Cullmann
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > at work we use cmake unity build to save time & costs.
> >
> > Would that be some
Hi,
at work we use cmake unity build to save time & costs.
Would that be some idea here, too?
Naturally as side effect that can hide compile issues
or introduce ones.
Greetings
Christoph
On Friday, April 18th, 2025 at 21:25, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
> Over the past week or two there h
or features you not use
yourself at all),
any meaningful review is a full-time job. e.g. in our company you would let
some student
test the changed behavior some days. This is just not feasible for me, and yes,
for some of these changes, rather than abandoning them (and trashing precious
work
just be ticked of.
For the licensing, Jonathan, is it ok to remove the TODO there and say "OK"?
Perhaps some link to a mail to an public list would be nice there.
Greetings
Christoph
--
----- Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewandte Informatik
Hi,
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Christoph Cullmann
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't understand why all framework discussions must happen on the
>>> same list. It just adds to a crazy amount of noise, which one then
>>> needs to
cussions must happen on the
> same list. It just adds to a crazy amount of noise, which one then
> needs to parse through.
If you would have baloo-devel I could understand that point,
but not with some other generic mailing list like kde-devel which
has the same amount of noise and is not ev
rg/?p=clones%2Fbaloo%2Fcullmann%2Ftbaloo.git
That is just a proposal and then I started the discussion.
Until now, we have one other proposal, by Boudhayan, to fixup baloo.
>
> (If the discussion continues on kde-frameworks-devel, I probably won't see it)
I won't see it on kde-dev
ustomization/entities/contributor.entities
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,527 +0,0 @@
> - Zé
>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> >> unsubscribe <<
>
--
-- Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewandte In
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:36:05 AM David Jarvie wrote:
> On Mon, July 11, 2011 8:40 pm, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > On Monday, July 11, 2011 09:32:10 PM Ingo Malchow wrote:
> >> Please don't reply to that as of now, it looks quite strange. Needs to
> >> be con
On Monday, July 11, 2011 09:32:10 PM Ingo Malchow wrote:
> Please don't reply to that as of now, it looks quite strange. Needs to
> be confirmed. And to be remembered, we don't "sell" link exchanges nor
> do we accept those.
Read my other mail here, he is a known farmer and tries that with multiple
Hi all,
don't waste your time with this request for translation.
And don't ever call or link him!
He is a scammer/pisher/whatever, he mailed the gcc list, too, with two
different names (but same telephone number). And he mail me today, too.
Same trick for kate-editor.org
Greetings
Christoph
On Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:34:49 pm Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> On Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:06:23 am Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
> > On 05/19/2011 10:57 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 08:09, Hugo Pereira Da Costa
> > >
> > > wrot
ng mode". we do consult bko on a
> regular basis and address issues there.
I just reopened https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245807
Anyone interested can CC himself there, CCed hugo.
Greetings
Christoph
--
-- Christoph Cullmann -
AbsInt Angewand
Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2011, 00:41:40 schrieb David Jarvie:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 19:33:15 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2011, 19:03:41 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> > > A Tuesday, May 17, 2011, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
> > > > @all: please
Am Dienstag, 17. Mai 2011, 19:03:41 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> A Tuesday, May 17, 2011, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
> > @all: please keep the emotions out of this thread and be constructive. I
> > offered a possible solution for the "problem" yesterday and nobody seems
> > to be interested in act
opinion, I can only conclude:
Commercial vendors of Qt software must enforce an own style and not use the
set default, otherwise their applications might break, even with a default KDE
desktop.
And no, bug report forwarding doesn't help at all, if you are no open-source
applicati
On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:55:22 am Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Monday, May 16, 2011 07:52:26 AM Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Beside I doubt that 3rd-party Qt application developers want to work
> > around that issue. That really should be an optional setting (maybe even
> >
h tap-to-click enabled.
Beside I doubt that 3rd-party Qt application developers want to work around
that issue. That really should be an optional setting (maybe even with warning
the user that this can result in interesting behaviour for some applications)
Greetings
Christoph
--
-
28 matches
Mail list logo
