Re: why are bugs ignored over months?

2011-09-21 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:35:17 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > what exactly are you missing in the difference between developers / users > > my user-support is writing bug-reports, this is what i can do > and this bugreport is the best sample that nobody is interested in the > help of users - so the devel

Re: why are bugs ignored over months?

2011-09-21 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:15:43 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 21.09.2011 12:30, schrieb Brad Hards: > > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:21:39 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > >> because i have not the knowledge and time to learn fix kde-bugs? > > > > I think this is basically the same

Re: why are bugs ignored over months?

2011-09-21 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:21:39 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > because i have not the knowledge and time to learn fix kde-bugs? I think this is basically the same as saying that this bug is not important to you (i.e. you have other things to spend your time on). Yet you think someone else should spend th

Re: why are bugs ignored over months?

2011-09-21 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:11:43 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270414 > > why in the world does nobody care about bugs like > basic-operations (and rename a file is really one > since many years) for half a year? I see lots of comments, so many people care. However the

Re: Trouble building Kate

2011-09-18 Thread Brad Hards
On Sunday 18 September 2011 19:38:21 Hartmut Noack wrote: > CMake Error at app/CMakeLists.txt:30 (kde4_add_library): >Unknown CMake command "kde4_add_library". This should have come from the "kdelibs development package". Perhaps libkde4-devel is not sufficient, and there is some other related

Re: KFileDialog is not setting $HOME as a default directory

2011-08-25 Thread Brad Hards
On Thursday 25 August 2011 04:29:57 Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote: > nobody Possibly a bug. Its hard to tell without a minimal, complete, compilable example. > Tsiapaliwkas Giorgos (terietor) > KDE Developer So you can have fun debugging it :-) Brad >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinf

Re: qca-ossl-plugin

2011-07-05 Thread Brad Hards
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 20:16:54 Joachim Langenbach wrote: > Ok, but the actual one supported doesn't allow easy builds on windows. The qconf support for windows has gotten better in recent times (the docs are dated though). Checking for support on the delta mailing list may be useful. > So I >

Re: qca-ossl-plugin

2011-07-03 Thread Brad Hards
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 06:09:37 PM Joachim Langenbach wrote: > Good morning all, > > since we need the qca-ossl-plugin within one of our project, I've thought > about improving the cmake support. What problems are you seeing? Note that cmake is considered a secondary build system for QCA (hence the .

Re: Releases of the thing that was KDE

2011-06-06 Thread Brad Hards
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:36:52 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > The results on the platform sprint read like more chaos is coming. > > I get we need to modularize for a number of important reasons, but I don't > see the companion story for how this all gets released as something > coherent and functional.

Re: Floating point exception in KApplication?

2011-04-09 Thread Brad Hards
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 04:59:14 pm Ian Wadham wrote: > Urk! a and b were both zero, so it divided by zero. And T = unsigned int, > so why do I get "Floating point exception"? That is what SIGFPE usually means - "divide by zero". There are other possibilities, but that is the most common in my experi

Re: GSOC: Wireshark KDE4 user interface proposal (searching mentor)

2011-04-05 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:04:19 am Warren Dumortier wrote: > Since there's still no working sniffing application available for KDE i'd > like to know if someone would be interrested in mentoring me for developing > such an application? Do you know about ksniffer? http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/

Re: Current Problem KDEPIM [was Re: Errarous Release 4.5.5 today]

2011-01-13 Thread Brad Hards
On Thursday, January 13, 2011 08:08:47 pm Juergen Sauer wrote: > *Again*, the problem is that the whole project advances version numbers in > the way like M$ sales mangers are enforceing the release date, without > respecting the status of the code. The release policy and rationale is shown at KDE