I am 100% for this. Most AI tools just scrape (read: steal) code from
whatever source they can, with no attribution or consideration for legal
rights/copyright.
Accepting any AI generated code is a legal risk unless the source of the
code can be verified.
I would wager 99.999% of people usin
Hi,
I have the feeling that two topics are being mixed here. One is AI and the
other one is spam.
12.05.2025 15:41:41 Akseli :
> On 12 May 2025 16.28.02 EEST, Jin Liu wrote:
>> Akseli 于2025年5月12日周一 20:53写道：
>>> We should take a more public stance on disallowing all this slop. Lengthy
>>> git
On Monday 12 May 2025 18:06:13 Eastern European Summer Time Christoph Cullmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, May 12th, 2025 at 16:19, Harald Sitter wrote:
> > It being generated by AI is not the same as it being low quality
> > though? Are we against low quality or against AI?
>
> I think there i
Hi,
On Monday, May 12th, 2025 at 16:19, Harald Sitter wrote:
>
>
> It being generated by AI is not the same as it being low quality
> though? Are we against low quality or against AI?
I think there is a big difference between just low quality and AI.
Naturally high quality contributions ar
It being generated by AI is not the same as it being low quality
though? Are we against low quality or against AI?
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 4:11 PM Akseli wrote:
>
> On 12 May 2025 16.40.44 EEST, Harald Sitter wrote:
> >I mean, I guess.
> >
> >I am not exactly sure what a sign somewhere will help
On 12 May 2025 16.40.44 EEST, Harald Sitter wrote:
>I mean, I guess.
>
>I am not exactly sure what a sign somewhere will help. People can just
>ignore it, after all, they ignored the code of conduct (be
>considerate) as well as the seemingly obvious courtesy of not wasting
>other people's time...
On 12 May 2025 16.28.02 EEST, Jin Liu wrote:
>Akseli 于2025年5月12日周一 20:53写道：
>> We should take a more public stance on disallowing all this slop. Lengthy
>> gitlab issues that are just full of nonsense generated by a bot just take
>> time out of everyones schedules, trying to decipher if its ser
I mean, I guess.
I am not exactly sure what a sign somewhere will help. People can just
ignore it, after all, they ignored the code of conduct (be
considerate) as well as the seemingly obvious courtesy of not wasting
other people's time... may as well ignore the sign. At the same time
routing all
Akseli 于2025年5月12日周一 20:53写道：
> We should take a more public stance on disallowing all this slop. Lengthy
> gitlab issues that are just full of nonsense generated by a bot just take
> time out of everyones schedules, trying to decipher if its serious or not.
I assume this doesn't include auto-c
Hi
There's been a lot of "AI" slop spam to various KDE projects, bug reports,
forums, etc..
We should take a more public stance on disallowing all this slop. Lengthy
gitlab issues that are just full of nonsense generated by a bot just take time
out of everyones schedules, trying to decipher if
10 matches
Mail list logo
