KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master) (22 April 2025)

2025-04-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for multiple reasons. Bad news: 5 repositories have started failing Good news: 2 repositories fixed neochat - NEW * https://invent.kde.org/network/neochat

Re: Fixing tests failing on CI but not on local system

2025-04-22 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:24 AM Stefano Crocco wrote: > Hello to everyone, > Hi Stefano, > recently, I've being trying to fix failing Konqueror tests, and in doing > so I'm > facing some issue with the CI tests which I don't know how to solve. > > The first issue is that one test passes on my

Fixing tests failing on CI but not on local system

2025-04-22 Thread Stefano Crocco
Hello to everyone, recently, I've being trying to fix failing Konqueror tests, and in doing so I'm facing some issue with the CI tests which I don't know how to solve. The first issue is that one test passes on my system but fails when run by the CI (it's the konqview test at [1]). I couldn't sp

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Maciej Jesionowski
Yes, that is a full clean build after the build directory is configured from scratch. The dependencies are prepared before that, and this is just the time to run ninja which lists 4900 build steps or so (I can't remember). I mean, the build isn't exactly very fast even on a reasonably high-end syst

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:53 PM Maciej Jesionowski wrote: > Yes, that is a full clean build after the build directory is configured > from scratch. The dependencies are prepared before that, and this is just > the time to run ninja which lists 4900 build steps or so (I can't > remember). I mean,

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:44 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 07:15 +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:57 AM Dmitry Kazakov > > wrote: > > > Hi, Ben! > > > > > > > > > Hey Dmitry, > > > > > > > > As for Krita, most of CI time is spent on the Windows p

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 07:15 +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:57 AM Dmitry Kazakov > wrote: > > Hi, Ben! > > > > > Hey Dmitry, >   > > > > As for Krita, most of CI time is spent on the Windows pipeline, > > which build extremely slowly due to done obscure filesystem issues

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:53 AM Maciej Jesionowski wrote: > Hi, > Hi Maciej, > Are these servers running multiple builds at a time, or is a Windows build > given the full host resources, i.e. 8c/16t and 64GB of RAM? If you can > monitor the resources in real time, it would be interesting to co

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Maciej Jesionowski
Hi, Are these servers running multiple builds at a time, or is a Windows build given the full host resources, i.e. 8c/16t and 64GB of RAM? If you can monitor the resources in real time, it would be interesting to confirm if indeed the CPU utilization is significantly lower than 100%, meaning someth

Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-22 Thread Dmitry Kazakov
Hi, Ben! As for Krita, most of CI time is spent on the Windows pipeline, which build extremely slowly due to done obscure filesystem issues (searching includes is extremely slow). I personally don't know how to fix it. I tried: 1) PCH builds, 2) relative includes, 3) split debug info (dwo). The on