On 8/19/23 18:42, Scarlett Moore wrote:
Only on release! We will not be building from master! We don't want
unstable snaps.
Thanks,
Scarlett
Aha! Sounds fine, then. In fact I believe this is the direction we want
to go in with FlatHub too: triggering the remote builds from spec files
located
Only on release! We will not be building from master! We don't want
unstable snaps.
Thanks,
Scarlett
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023, 4:03 PM Nate Graham wrote:
> On 8/19/23 15:45, Scarlett Moore wrote:
> > No. It will be telling launchpad to build them via API. Launchpad will
> > upload to store its own a
On 8/19/23 15:45, Scarlett Moore wrote:
No. It will be telling launchpad to build them via API. Launchpad will
upload to store its own artifacts. Our current setup has launchpad
sending the snaps back to our server and we upload to store. This new
proposal would be significantly less data goin
No. It will be telling launchpad to build them via API. Launchpad will
upload to store its own artifacts. Our current setup has launchpad sending
the snaps back to our server and we upload to store. This new proposal
would be significantly less data going back and forth. Also, do the stable
branche
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 3:23 AM Nate Graham wrote:
> So are these proposed CI jobs really intended to *release* the Snaps on
> the store? Is there any way to just build the Snaps locally?
>
> I ask because CI jobs run on every commit, so what we need them to test
> is that a proposed change hasn'
So are these proposed CI jobs really intended to *release* the Snaps on
the store? Is there any way to just build the Snaps locally?
I ask because CI jobs run on every commit, so what we need them to test
is that a proposed change hasn't broken Snap generation. We don't want
to upload somethin
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023, 7:48 AM Nate Graham wrote:
> Right now, our Flatpak CI jobs are self-contained; they generate a
> Flatpak without the need for any external servers. They're not uploading
> anything to FlatHub or elsewhere.
>
> I might be misunderstanding something, but it seems like these p
Right now, our Flatpak CI jobs are self-contained; they generate a
Flatpak without the need for any external servers. They're not uploading
anything to FlatHub or elsewhere.
I might be misunderstanding something, but it seems like these proposed
Snap CI jobs will be interacting with an externa
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023, 1:31 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 8:47 AM Scarlett Moore <
> scarlett.gately.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, 12:53 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:45 AM Nicolas Fella
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 18.08.23 um 21
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 8:47 AM Scarlett Moore <
scarlett.gately.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, 12:53 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:45 AM Nicolas Fella
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 18.08.23 um 21:41 schrieb Ben Cooksley:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:17 P
10 matches
Mail list logo
