Re: Shift for parts of the CI system to Qt 5.15

2020-06-21 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Saturday, 20 June 2020 10:11:04 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > On Saturday, 20 June 2020 08:20:18 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > > - kaffeine > > This doesn't look like something caused by Qt 5.15, more like an issue with > the FreeBSD DVB headers, builds on Linux. https://invent.kde.org/multimedia/k

Re: Shift for parts of the CI system to Qt 5.15

2020-06-21 Thread David Faure
On samedi 20 juin 2020 12:25:42 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > - ktorrent (when linking with taglib) Looks like the fix I made to fix ktorrent (failing to link with taglib) also fixed the FreeBSD issue you mention. https://build.kde.org/job/Extragear/job/ktorrent/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/ -- Da

Re: Winding down Phabricator

2020-06-21 Thread L. E. Segovia
Hi Ben, We GSoC students (at least in the Krita project) have been requested to keep track of our progress via Phabricator tasks. Must we manually link to changes now? On 21/06/2020 03:38, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, With the completion of Phase 1 of our move to Gitlab, all code review acti

Re: Winding down Phabricator

2020-06-21 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
Phabricator will stay running for now since there are many pending tasks and reviews on it. We also need to archive reviews for read-only access before we shut it down, which will take some time. - You can continue using Phabricator tasks. - Phabricator code reviews still work, but we *really*

Re: Winding down Phabricator

2020-06-21 Thread Frederik Schwarzer
Hi, thanks for putting so much effort in the transition. We, as the German translation team, use Phabricator for reviewing the work of casual contributors. I wonder how other teams handle this. I am not saying, Phabricator going away will break our workflow completely but it is a good way to