El dijous, 20 de febrer de 2020, a les 14:29:47 CET, Allen Winter va escriure:
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:09:02 PM EST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimecres, 19 de febrer de 2020, a les 9:28:22 CET, Volker Krause va
> > escriure:
> > > Additionally, improved documentation, a possible K
I'm working on a social media client for KDE [1] and I want to store secrets
for this application "the right way". It deals with OAuth access tokens. I
figure putting that into the secret service[2] was the right way but I get the
following error[3].
If Secret Service isn't the way and somethin
El jue., 20 de feb. de 2020 a la(s) 10:30, Allen Winter
(win...@kde.org) escribió:
>
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:09:02 PM EST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimecres, 19 de febrer de 2020, a les 9:28:22 CET, Volker Krause va
> > escriure:
> > > Additionally, improved documentation, a poss
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:09:02 PM EST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimecres, 19 de febrer de 2020, a les 9:28:22 CET, Volker Krause va
> escriure:
> > Additionally, improved documentation, a possible KNAM and/or driving the
> > QNAM
> > changes upstream can still be done alongside this
On Wednesday, 19 February 2020 10:04:11 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:30 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 19 February 2020 08:05:01 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:42 AM Volker Krause wrote:
> > > > I agree on the problem of QNAM's default, se
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:09 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2020, 08:05:01 CET schrieb Ben Cooksley:
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:42 AM Volker Krause wrote:
> > > It would also help to know where specifically we have that problem, so we
> > > can actually solve it
