---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129605/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2018, 2:04 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
Am 2018-01-25 18:45, schrieb Michael Heidelbach:
Hi!
Currently I'm working on some code I couldn't understand until I split
some long functions into smaller parts.
As I couldn't find anything about the size-of-a-function topic in the
KDE or Qt guide lines I consider this as a matter of personal
El 25 ene. 2018, a la(s) 14:45, Michael Heidelbach escribió:
> Hi!
>
> Currently I'm working on some code I couldn't understand until I split some
> long functions into smaller parts.
>
> As I couldn't find anything about the size-of-a-function topic in the KDE or
> Qt guide lines I consider
Hi!
Currently I'm working on some code I couldn't understand until I split
some long functions into smaller parts.
As I couldn't find anything about the size-of-a-function topic in the
KDE or Qt guide lines I consider this as a matter of personal taste.
I don't want to step on anybody's toe
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Michael Heidelbach wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When I do
>
> git checkout -b A origin/master
>
> (changes)
>
> git checkout -b B A
>
> (changes)
>
>
> git checkout A
>
> arc diff
>
> git checkout B
>
> arc diff
>
> Will phabricator show the relation of A and B? Is that a reas
Hi!
When I do
git checkout -b A origin/master
(changes)
git checkout -b B A
(changes)
git checkout A
arc diff
git checkout B
arc diff
Will phabricator show the relation of A and B? Is that a reasonable
approach, anyway?
Michael
